Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com> Wed, 03 February 2010 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BF63A6C42 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:31:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6iWoa79CiMfR for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8ED3A6CE4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so1942156fxm.15 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:32:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=DxMgM2idLIYa5XykQqvTsvX453Tf4kzy5f4KH75ztDA=; b=npcHtF4b0anZrYNPYlat/4T88TwGBdx5DPcFJo5DgAGXJXynjRKKo+ZM21TDmmQea4 6ExdPiiF5sXf59TKYO5X9i1k8x2w0ud+wZFSGjspqRjwDR032kCGRpn6ks0VB993NxdP K5UZp1nUi1JHlfjIC2X2+fepnZBPQv6VsFH4s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tZs5+M3oj+vBb5jbhfiZWUTMW67SgkzdwvvOPExS501vtsycvP8AhIH1rkkOr4J57v C3BOh4g4+jSoBY4udkLQyhGMW7x48P1zXd4sbYKBE7s33XpFlrcV7UiAO/c4zAyp3Ix2 ebK83Nm5E0OKTCArTQ0mWDeayvlEUC1+VlP2I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.163.81 with SMTP id z59mr60490wek.95.1265229149726; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:32:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152@nokia.com>
References: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:32:29 -0500
Message-ID: <1e41a3231002031232r6ec9edd3p6367dd9c2581fa08@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org WG" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:31:51 -0000
I would like to see tcpm take on the initial window issue, though as Joe notes we probably do not yet know enough to formally take this on as a charter item. (Or, would this be a tsvwg item due to possible wider impact?) A couple thoughts: - A large initial window should probably only be used by mutual agreement. Maybe via a TCP option during the handshake? - A significant increase to the initial window might benefit from introduction of some form of pacing, since you won't have any ack clock yet. This might help reduce losses and delay jitter. -John On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Jerry Chu has recently started the discussion on whether we need to think about tweaking TCP for the "modern Internet." Just came across another presentation from (AFAICT) another corner of Google that makes similar arguments. > > FYI: http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/An_Argument_For_Changing_TCP_Slow_Start.pdf > > This topic seems to be gaining momentum, and the WG should take some time considering if there is work here for it. > > Lars > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > >
- [tcpm] TCP tuning Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Adam Langley
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning SCHARF, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Stefanos Harhalakis
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Kacheong Poon
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Kacheong Poon
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Adam Langley
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning John Heffner
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Biswas, Anumita
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning John Heffner
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Biswas, Anumita
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Murali Bashyam
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning John Heffner
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Marco Mellia
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning rick jones
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mike Belshe
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning rick jones
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning rick jones
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Alexander Zimmermann
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Kacheong Poon
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Kacheong Poon
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning SCHARF, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning SCHARF, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Andrew Yourtchenko
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning rick jones
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Kacheong Poon
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning SCHARF, Michael
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning rick jones
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Jerry Chu
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mike Belshe
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning Joe Touch