Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning

rick jones <perfgeek@mac.com> Thu, 04 February 2010 03:42 UTC

Return-Path: <perfgeek@mac.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A903A6B27 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:42:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOZGHLJs28ds for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:42:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtpout017.mac.com (asmtpout017.mac.com [17.148.16.92]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3C83A6A4F for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:42:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (76-220-56-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.220.56.223]) by asmtp017.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KXA0094GT0RG470@asmtp017.mac.com> for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:43:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-1002030243
Message-id: <E086E248-DEFA-4AA4-B25D-F7FBB0FB9E7D@mac.com>
From: rick jones <perfgeek@mac.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
In-reply-to: <4B69CDD7.6060802@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:43:39 -0800
References: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152@nokia.com> <133D9897FB9C5E4E9DF2779DC91E947C025F1861@SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de> <d1c2719f1002031110v3b76ca9eu14c9a110847548e7@mail.gmail.com> <4B69CDD7.6060802@isi.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, "SCHARF, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:42:56 -0000

On Feb 3, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Joe Touch wrote:

>
>
> Jerry Chu wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:17 AM, SCHARF, Michael
>> <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>>>> This topic seems to be gaining momentum, and the WG should
>>>> take some time considering if there is work here for it.
>>> IMHO there could indeed be room for increasing the initial window.  
>>> If
>>> most data transfers continue to be smaller than 3 MSS, a larger  
>>> initial
>>> window would not necessarily cause harm, as it is seldomly used.  
>>> Still,
>>> this would speed up those data transfers that currently suffer from
>>> Slow-Start.
>>
>> Actually our data points to the contrary - the average web object  
>> and page
>> size have been rising steadily. E.g., the majority of our search  
>> responses
>> no longer fit in 3 MSS these days.
>
> This should be relevant only for the first response from a given IP
> address; persistent connections should render this moot for subsequent
> requests.

Modulo slow-start after idle.  Such as what one might experience  
between viewing the Nth and N+1st search result page.

rick jones