IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Fri, 12 February 2010 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE2F3A763B for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:30:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.471
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.471 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.128, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydPQRTMwEpO8 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A845E3A7789 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:30:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.95] (pool-71-106-88-10.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.88.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1C2ULO9020236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B74BD3D.8020407@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:30:21 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>
References: <20100211164333.7C61C86FAA1@lawyers.icir.org> <4B74358B.90804@isi.edu> <2a10ed241002111821x97a1f56l20732f70a22d8213@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2a10ed241002111821x97a1f56l20732f70a22d8213@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1B32688369C6715761C215E9"
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, Kacheong Poon <kacheong.poon@sun.com>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, mallman@icir.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:30:15 -0000


Mike Belshe wrote:
...
> Has anyone, on this list or otherwise, suggested that we should change
> these items "RIGHT NOW" or without a "reasonable level of analysis"?

Yes. I'm referring specifically to the recent discussions on this list,
which suggested that either this was urgent (the "right now" part) or
that this didn't need analysis ("it's out in the wild")

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email