IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Wed, 03 February 2010 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0482C3A68A7 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:40:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TjfB1wYKhhwX for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39E43A691C for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:40:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so319301vws.31 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:41:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=1qzd9sxvX8HC0atSC2z5sVlBV5vh1qazKV3EdZcjJGE=; b=t4brd/vH8oTwub7fxYB/XxIxR8g7rh8RpOkVG74UPL7PcHpVj2/PrSL0gs2ZdiQS1Y H5BiAjP25GIx+ks5i5Ip4xcjilQTvJqaXSkan/TmvrotH616C65HPKQngttiLBSMGrkw GVNYh4idVA2GH5YKzzbzzxQanfBhTLU23nkMg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=f5GB6DCcYXhy20nRzpt1EEfMuRFgcAb+tDNmWCYFya17CxswcJJEFW3uN2Emx1O9Ev 120Xbu3HSNGFAPu4ABQj4Fp5q1NqvIQHtkzVIeC/iAhNwdgy/10eLr3gUfxLqSo+wsK/ E+DZEv1zssP5peOQyR4O62w9A5Yw/PI/nf3RA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.124.106 with SMTP id t42mr6546002vcr.32.1265208063549; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:41:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152@nokia.com>
References: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:41:03 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a4461cbbf5db5f87
Message-ID: <396556a21002030641x41074f9cyef07cadd3cd01666@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org WG" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:40:26 -0000

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> wrote:
> Jerry Chu has recently started the discussion on whether we need to think about tweaking TCP for the "modern Internet." Just came across another presentation from (AFAICT) another corner of Google that makes similar arguments.
>
> FYI: http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/An_Argument_For_Changing_TCP_Slow_Start.pdf
>
> This topic seems to be gaining momentum, and the WG should take some time considering if there is work here for it.

The slide format of the presentation possibly isn't the easiest to
read, but I hope that it's understandable. If people have questions,
please do ask.

Mike, Jerry and I are all (mostly) in the same corner of Google
although the above file is regarding SPDY, our new HTTP serialisation:

http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-whitepaper


Cheers

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email