IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 25 April 2014 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7128C1A068E for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.472
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.472 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4mUxxKcOVpi for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8EB1A0673 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3PMJ2Ph028326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <535ADF56.9050106@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:19:02 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
References: <20140425221257.12559.43206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140425221257.12559.43206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140425221257.12559.43206.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/F4d4WrrW1RxWw5v9uNnslYmBVCc
Subject: [tcpm] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:19:41 -0000

Updated with all the pending suggestions. In some cases, I didn't quite 
use the exact text I suggested in email, but I figure the doc is in its 
early stages, so I opted for speed vs. accuracy ;-)

I'd like to ask the chairs if we can consider a call to make this a WG doc?

(given the work of the group is supposed to happen on the list - and I 
don't attend meetings in person these days -this doesn't seem like it 
needs to wait for a meeting to proceed)

Joe

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:12:57 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Wesley M. Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>,        Dr. Joseph D. Touch 
<touch@isi.edu>, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>,        Wesley Eddy 
<wes@mti-systems.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Joe Touch and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo
Revision:	01
Title:		TCP Extended Data Offset Option
Document date:	2014-04-25
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		11
URL: 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-edo-01

Abstract:
    TCP segments include a Data Offset field to indicate space for TCP
    options, but the size of the field can limit the space available for
    complex options that have evolved. This document updates RFC 793
    with an optional TCP extension to that space and explains why such
    extensions cannot be used in the initial SYN of a connection.

 



Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email