Re: [tcpm] feedcback on tcp-secure-05

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Thu, 13 July 2006 18:08 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G15bW-00012w-JK; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:08:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G15bV-00012l-1W for tcpm@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:08:01 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G15bT-0002QM-NS for tcpm@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:08:01 -0400
Received: from [132.219.18.179] (h12b3-net84db.lab.risq.net [132.219.18.179] (may be forged)) by vapor.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id k6DI6mH01509; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <44B68BB1.90402@isi.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:06:41 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall Stewart <rrs@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] feedcback on tcp-secure-05
References: <44B682AB.9010702@isi.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607132034230.8689@netcore.fi> <44B68831.5000307@isi.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607132055520.9253@netcore.fi> <44B68A3C.5000506@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <44B68A3C.5000506@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2086919301=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org


Randall Stewart wrote:
> Note to Joe, the older revision of anti-spoof comes right
> from the xml database... not sure why it did not snarf
> your latest version..

I don't use XML, so maybe they incorporate xml2rfc-based stuff more
quickly?

If not, it's _very_ out of date ;-)

Joe

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm