IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] WG status update

"Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> Wed, 10 November 2010 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rs@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903083A67FF for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:34:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUFhs8vScdNb for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.netapp.com (mx4.netapp.com [217.70.210.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8C128C0E7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:34:45 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,177,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="225587521"
Received: from smtp3.europe.netapp.com ([10.64.2.67]) by mx4-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2010 04:35:07 -0800
Received: from amsrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (emeaexchrs.hq.netapp.com [10.64.251.107]) by smtp3.europe.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id oAACZ6rv004515; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 04:35:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.65.251.108]) by amsrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:35:06 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:35:04 -0000
Message-ID: <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0B54DF67@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4821F155C3@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] WG status update
Thread-Index: AQHLgHIHUw43nIWZ1Ei4oXaJ2dgBYJNqoylw
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB4821F155C3@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
From: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2010 12:35:06.0260 (UTC) FILETIME=[B45C6540:01CB80D3]
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status update
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:34:47 -0000

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp-02
Status: polled for interest on 6/16/10
        one positive response; no negative - too weak for adoption


I have been under the impression, that Lars specifically approached the
authors to update and resubmit a new revision of the draft, before this
can move forward.

For the record, I share the opinion of Anumita (adopt this as WG item,
updated with the most recent studies on stability / ICCRG input).

Ditto for draft-rhee-tcpm-cubic


Richard Scheffenegger

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email