IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] WG status update

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 20 August 2009 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E42828C284 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.361
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.361 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.238, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lRYnkOO3agdL for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6C528C1EA for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7196B65DA; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:29:53 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.151] (129-130-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.130.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n7KATkXS016580; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:29:48 -0300
Message-ID: <4A8D259B.4060409@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:29:47 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47919CC542@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47919CC542@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:29:52 -0300 (ART)
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] WG status update
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:29:57 -0000

Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon] wrote:

> Timestamps
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
> Action: ???

This document could possibly become a BCP.

I recall we talked with David Borman a little bit about this one in
MPLS, and I seem to recall that this one of the possible outcomes. I
also seem to recall that David was thinking about tweaking rfc1323 in
response to this I-D (e.g., recommend timestamps to be monotonically
increasing across connections).

David? (CC'ed)

Thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email