Re: [tcpm] tcp-security: Request for feedback on the outline of the document

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Fernando Gont wrote:
...
> I'm not saying the outline you propose is "wrong". I'm saying it's not
> the best approach for the public this document targets. That doesn't
> mean that an alternative outline can be included in an appendix. -- that
> may be useful.

The public already has the doc you already wrote. This discussion is
about what the WG should produce.

There is no current list of threats in TCP. If this doc is intended
primarily at implementers, then we should consider splitting out the doc
that talks about the threats as a separate doc.

As to the current organization, I've proposed one that's hierarchical
and has things in predictable places. The current outline is mostly
flat, and has things in multiple places. Do you have a proposal to
organize the current outline into an alternate hierarchical structure?

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqdOgwACgkQE5f5cImnZrvydgCfQ1ygWZiRMLIJnMjGIK3Qn7m6
Rh4An1wcPGxbRxBj9SaLlwULcRlnyIdr
=kI47
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----