Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream

Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org> Fri, 27 August 2021 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A9D3A0CD2 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LnJYzrJXuRSz for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.goatley.com (www.goatley.com [198.137.202.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B623A0CCC for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trixy.bergandi.net (cpe-76-176-14-122.san.res.rr.com [76.176.14.122]) by wwwlocal.goatley.com (PMDF V6.8 #2433) with ESMTP id <0QYI08HFUJOD72@wwwlocal.goatley.com> for terminology@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:33:49 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from blockhead.local ([69.12.173.8]) by trixy.bergandi.net (PMDF V6.7-x01 #2433) with ESMTPSA id <0QYI007E6JHW7S@trixy.bergandi.net> for terminology@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net ([69.12.173.8] EXTERNAL) (EHLO blockhead.local) with TLS/SSL by trixy.bergandi.net ([10.0.42.18]) (PreciseMail V3.3); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:30:03 -0700
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:33:40 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
In-reply-to: <75059653.22122.1630053646465@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
Message-id: <bd39906c-df90-6fa3-b391-7567dfb18141@lounge.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0
X-PMAS-SPF: SPF check skipped for authenticated session (recv=trixy.bergandi.net, send-ip=69.12.173.8)
X-PMAS-External-Auth: 69-12-173-8.static.dsltransport.net [69.12.173.8] (EHLO blockhead.local)
References: <94194463.1597269.1630036678075.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <94194463.1597269.1630036678075@mail.yahoo.com> <702578c5-8068-4f6b-75ca-fe58d1bcf758@gmail.com> <75059653.22122.1630053646465@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
X-PMAS-Software: PreciseMail V3.3 [210826] (trixy.bergandi.net)
X-PMAS-Allowed: system rule (rule allow header:X-PMAS-External noexists)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/FX9L5_KQefrL-1nP-naZyuygF0U>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 19:33:57 -0000


On 8/27/21 1:40 AM, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>> Il 27/08/2021 07:01 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>   
>> Hat on as a member of the Independent Stream Editorial Board
>> (ISEB, https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/iseb/).
>>
>> There is a review process for Independent Stream documents, and
>> there's no automatic right to publication.
> However, the rejection of that draft might be misinterpreted, or misconstrued, as another proof of the alleged racism of the IETF community, especially by people who are not its members and who do not understand how the process works. The ISEB should put special care in discussing the issue with the authors so that the result of the editorial process is not viewed as controversial.

   Racism against whom? The authors?

   That's one of the problems with this draft. It's starts with an 
assumption and
any attempt to falsify that assumption is taken as proof of its 
validity. The
notion that denial of racism is evidence of racism is akin to the "when 
did you
stop beating your wife?" accusation.

   Publication of this draft would be misunderstood by the exact community
you talk about-- people who are not members and who do not understand how
the process works. There are lots of people who think "oh, RFC... that's a
standard." And those people would take an RFC that talks about "the racists
amongst us [at the IETF]" as if it had the imprimatur of the IETF.

   Given that the existence of this draft was already used by an author to
promote language policing in at least one other organization (IEEE 802) 
I can
only assume that publication of this draft would result in more of the same
but with more authority, an actual RFC behind it-- "look, there's an actual
RFC on the subject that you can refer to!"

   This draft needs to die.

   Dan.

-- 
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius