IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Fri, 27 August 2021 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0883A2564 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OJ4HGCc1fyop for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DAE93A2565 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 836846A0DA; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:40:46 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1630053646; bh=tAybPwG5gS/YQdKLSB3PHpFRBCCqBc8s+u2MTPHsUoU=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=cbSekhyl3oZNwQacTkPVuzSOjFp1DQ2YlTEdTRRQQX/1Ewo8q8XBbmVH2qru1BYRF 4mpON5w4suaA1xAE5ZJoxbGzGTYIf59OmrPLcIv5Vm9WZytppmlSobZUcdfWORhOaQ w0jV64rIQnnpXBb4Nnzg2p8rp0pYkmGZjxYpjLZvt35TnWS6i8j/jlAGqbaqIVVZRx Vsvp8FNusnYVN3IPaa/suHC8IIiILZHynp4oAy6a6uk9xxg+CS7m8QOpjP7+UVwljG se4tTWCxD3h3yR+CmJF9hk2zoif5yvffWyoI4q8NarNeKJRtb0L6fE+g/q2sHnbjBu NNZxIrYPp0NMg==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com ([10.20.28.82]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id E+cJIA6lKGG6PAAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>); Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:40:46 +0200
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 10:40:46 +0200
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <75059653.22122.1630053646465@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <702578c5-8068-4f6b-75ca-fe58d1bcf758@gmail.com>
References: <94194463.1597269.1630036678075.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <94194463.1597269.1630036678075@mail.yahoo.com> <702578c5-8068-4f6b-75ca-fe58d1bcf758@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.5-Rev21
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Autocrypt: addr=vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFhFR+UBCACfoywFKBRfzasiiR9/6dwY36eLePXcdScumDMR8qoXvRS55QYDjp5bs+yMq41qWV9 xp/cqryY9jnvHbeF3TsE5yEazpD1dleRbkpElUBpPwXqkrSP8uXO9KkS9KoX6gdml6M4L+F82WpqYC1 uTzOE6HPmhmQ4cGSgoia2jolxAhRpzoYN99/BwpvoZeTSLP5K6yPlMPYkMev/uZlAkMMhelli9IN6yA yxcC0AeHSnOAcNKUr13yXyMlTyi1cdMJ4sk88zIbefxwg3PAtYjkz3wgvP96cNVwAgSt4+j/ZuVaENP pgVuM512m051j9SlspWDHtzrci5pBKKFsibnTelrABEBAAG0NUJlcnRvbGEsIFZpdHRvcmlvIDx2aXR 0b3Jpby5iZXJ0b2xhQG9wZW4teGNoYW5nZS5jb20+iQFABBMBAgAqBAsJCAcGFQoJCAsCBRYCAwEAAp 4BAhsDBYkSzAMABQMAAAAABYJYRUflAAoJEIU2cHmzj8qNaG0H/ROY+suCP86hoN+9RIV66Ej8b3sb8 UgwFJOJMupZfeb9yTIJwE4VQT5lTt146CcJJ5jvxD6FZn1Htw9y4/45pPAF7xLE066jg3OqRvzeWRZ3 IDUfJJIiM5YGk1xWxDqppSwhnKcMOuI72iioWxX0nGQrWxpnWJsjt08IEEwuYucDkul1PHsrLJbTd58 fiMKLVwag+IE1SPHOwkPF6arZQZIfB5ThtOZV+36Jn8Hok9XfeXWBVyPkiWCQYVX39QsIbr0JNR9kQy 4g2ZFexOcTe8Jo12jPRL7V8OqStdDes3cje9lWFLnX05nrfLuE0l0JKWEg8akN+McFXc+oV68h7nu5A Q0EWEVH5QEIAIDKanNBe1uRfk8AjLirflZO291VNkOAeUu+dIhecGnZeQW6htlDinlYOnXhtsY1mK9W PUu+xshDq7lXn2G0LxldYwyJYZaJtDgIKqVqwxfA34Lj27oqPuXwcvGhdCgt0SW/YcalRdAi0/AzUCu 5GSaj2kaGUSnBYYUP4szGJXjaK2psP5toQSCtx2pfSXQ6MaqPK9Zzy+D5xc6VWQRp/iRImodAcPf8fg JJvRyJ8Jla3lKWyvBBzJDg6MOf6Fts78bJSt23X0uPp93g7GgbYkuRMnFI4RGoTVkxjD/HBEJ0CNg22 hoHJondhmKnZVrHEluFuSnW0wBEIYomcPSPB+cAEQEAAYkBMQQYAQIAGwUCWEVH5QIbDAQLCQgHBhUK CQgLAgUJEswDAAAKCRCFNnB5s4/KjdO8B/wNpvWtOpLdotR/Xh4fu08Fd63nnNfbIGIETWsVi0Sbr8i E5duuGaaWIcMmUvgKe/BM0Fpj9X01Zjm90uoPrlVVuQWrf+vFlbalUYVZr51gl5UyUFHk+iAZCAA0WB rsmACKvuV1P7GuiX3UV9b59T9taYJxN3dNFuftrEuvsqHimFtlekUjUwoCekTJdncFusBhwz2OrKhHr WWrEsXkfh0+pURWYAlKlTxvXuI7gAfHEQM+6OnrWvXYtlhd0M1sBPnCjbyG63Qws7Rek9bEWKtH6dA6 dmT2FQT+g1S9Mdf0WkPTQNX0x24dm8IoHuD3KYwX7Svx43Xa17aZnXqUjtj1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/vioylNtN7TtFA5JZIdWr6SN0Pss>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:40:59 -0000


> Il 27/08/2021 07:01 Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
>  
> Hat on as a member of the Independent Stream Editorial Board
> (ISEB, https://www.rfc-editor.org/about/iseb/).
> 
> There is a review process for Independent Stream documents, and
> there's no automatic right to publication. 

However, the rejection of that draft might be misinterpreted, or misconstrued, as another proof of the alleged racism of the IETF community, especially by people who are not its members and who do not understand how the process works. The ISEB should put special care in discussing the issue with the authors so that the result of the editorial process is not viewed as controversial.

-- 
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com 
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email