IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream

ned+terminology@mrochek.com Sat, 28 August 2021 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+terminology@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A803A1495 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNWQGn_CPLUx for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [98.153.82.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E403A1491 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01S34PRMVUBK00CTVU@mauve.mrochek.com> for terminology@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1630161084; bh=T6VaO6ER0Zj+dIhTDttkAPcBaIpS9IQCAgZsEzjhE2o=; h=Cc:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=XuIPUw80f8rBzV4Ugu658Nq/43BxUfxAgwKzPbB/6lj6+9DY8sQSer4P+WxxN0HSa I4mEHEWhGYM1FcYNXpguO2Xuc6vBYIZLCqiY3F0oF/QQVxwHokB2jjzbzDNHmbWL9s 9n0tqMYD3uQ9DFJUzF7/dYPuz+g/hsF1uXPne6y4=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01S34PECB48W00D1OX@mauve.mrochek.com>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
Message-id: <01S34PRKZ51W00D1OX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:29:57 -0700
From: ned+terminology@mrochek.com
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Fri, 27 Aug 2021 12:33:40 -0700" <bd39906c-df90-6fa3-b391-7567dfb18141@lounge.org>
References: <94194463.1597269.1630036678075.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <94194463.1597269.1630036678075@mail.yahoo.com> <702578c5-8068-4f6b-75ca-fe58d1bcf758@gmail.com> <75059653.22122.1630053646465@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <bd39906c-df90-6fa3-b391-7567dfb18141@lounge.org>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/OmAG47YsKx1egldK3RQwvuSuOFw>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:36:37 -0000

+1 to what Dan Harkins said. There are additional issues with this
draft, but the ones he pointed out are more than sufficient.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email