IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Fri, 03 September 2021 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467CE3A299A for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3EfV_kCYQpL8 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-f180.google.com (mail-yb1-f180.google.com [209.85.219.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00FDD3A2988 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-f180.google.com with SMTP id k65so290141yba.13 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V89cmIF4x6cwGGE/Gj09KHv4nlcitbrctKbdFvn18L8=; b=pJgBD7QtFneqBmGiJzIUhQ6e9OBMy9KMSY+PLi85G/us/l6kCzMck1tURGhwqGX3ez asPgGfTl3vfVjn0uLGb6S4S80GvkcKytejUOCRRJIj4KWtekfuyz8vt6X10hetgFgX9f QEgYePRMhldB1ha+v+v2C95YFkzdHKEbr0TNdbCItaoOvnkOrL6mQt/NcW7WJly9mRYH m3u0ZNTcEjt30lh9zfarsqUlcJ4G7WCU3S5QrjAutOjO9Q0a/hYKUmE6+ak5Ua+PVCYW 6dUSQ9ERV4mZTApMPWuyrBkB8zPEbp8ATJT5pHZalfsDNV79mAINBJG2fjO889TZDQXr Rhrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UY39JSrIeh1s9OODeWBsRdfbcktIaf5476AQ9tVeoH3uijNno 5WQb7DOV1Hu7sSGUyrUXfp8Fq2NKqJnjS84w5SA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxnJYtJNEYBl/omQf+ycqcrpwd5YeFsNnRpSQ2fnts887SFsyxjSMd065h6AwawJ4Z06Bkwi4diFv4HdXRz9zg=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:74cd:: with SMTP id p196mr726987ybc.454.1630695940141; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <94194463.1597269.1630036678075.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <94194463.1597269.1630036678075@mail.yahoo.com> <702578c5-8068-4f6b-75ca-fe58d1bcf758@gmail.com> <75059653.22122.1630053646465@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <bd39906c-df90-6fa3-b391-7567dfb18141@lounge.org> <4B1A66BC-9941-4436-854D-B513983050E5@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B1A66BC-9941-4436-854D-B513983050E5@akamai.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 15:05:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhukKr0ZdZTFstjjB7guDi7+mwXkrq4-KYgLVw7Rg4StQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003fb7e005cb1bfcc9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/n2XBSLPwz2hSIBI93xzbz9RXGos>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] offensive terminology draft progressing on independent stream
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 19:05:45 -0000

Gosh agreement... I also agree but for a different statement of the same
issue.

Racism and bigotry are a serious problem. But so is gatekeeping and
especially when people start deciding to appoint themselves gatekeepers.


This is a problem across the political spectrum and one of the reasons some
people make moves from what appear to be opposite ends of the spectrum is
that they were rejected by one end for trying to police it.

The term 'cancel culture' first came to prominence in the Trans community
when various factions started cancelling each other. Natalie Wynn belled
that particular cat when she was cancelled for daring to cast a Trans man
to do a very short voiceover in one of her videos.

And now of course, the term is almost exclusively used in bad faith.



On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 10:13 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I dislike the draft and am against its publication for the reasons Dan
> said.
>
>
> --
> Terminology mailing list
> Terminology@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email