Re: [Terminology] Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards (NISTIR 8366)

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 30 April 2021 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A293A26AA for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BmWQ_gKgqHVx for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 320C93A26A7 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id q6so24876921edr.3 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=n3+kEKo5z+jVOPzwe+h6APkwHXB87XG3/BOv6U/loQ0=; b=OvjBBHf0Y3r7JdkJE78oPD+S7+XgVttqn5wnnkQIAjlQn65nKyXqihCmQzpL9VyfM7 tYLxHW1mwNLrUycWH6lbxxcpukIC6GKTTDVmtGzDt+TxeLaXwWd9dJ/sOOhSIi+Sgrhd SLP+uY90fSQcWMr2CPDrVLkraJDrVFvZ9Pq1ApdouxUjofCxuBjPntVkc5bx+erKQD1d BVZIax/UA4Oi47oaw7lzC6b71UsU5lg0CSSHERaI2cnH/FgXcLYLnaeq19nkYGWJn0dM pYmFDY3aS/TlMKg96x0PTxeReUPQEkhrz6nhLMuvtVsu2J/cVxhLG36D+q9HsPWNQPAd o0QA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=n3+kEKo5z+jVOPzwe+h6APkwHXB87XG3/BOv6U/loQ0=; b=k6lvnpGgR3s5uRDfrgV4I0Uz4fp9enmXXvIS10tTGu4Eeda8qxCGMgZllsUteMuFCC njmWG+TiI9ddT+hcj3D1mKGX/CB6/f0dukb56m5TVccJEvJBIFhSwSgRuBl9RgU4pZK6 00f3yGMRLOEA82QkkB8lLahB0IKTAH8NjF/7OwBK5fLms4nymP+zX5FS63uMzkxj98eR MwKyS8K/m9aRoHpmPB0zYBvv01iAkaysANy7F+RexotkTR14K95Ot8L1zE3mHzulv162 t0ELNEXq6jsDiGp/NIEmMp3LvvNhUnsWKs0oI/0SBC/jgjzLi7Q5Ex4lTwm7sszS4Quf 0qfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310ggDlpfBZkH/sB1VwCGMhHBhqgu8RJi30augu6zv2XFVHUrkj IS1vi4obv8E365QT1IUfbLiegmXls1cDlQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznA1j0Ua+jPBVIHMuKViwZcAL2KaOrZj00YaeiCoBJ4qZ1WBFUAIvhyyV3lh072aZoK2uhxg==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de02:: with SMTP id h2mr8379082edv.61.1619816236468; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm2454625edq.67.2021.04.30.13.57.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <C1DC5170-3FBE-4014-B7A7-CDD9429746CD@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F662CF09-818B-43D8-8F7D-031A3F79E5E4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 13:57:07 -0700
In-Reply-To: <3628f7a2-f9d6-f21c-9d66-1c37dea54f02@network-heretics.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
To: terminology@ietf.org
References: <c9f82250-8df4-6c5b-f71d-2559448fa06d@digitaldissidents.org> <66B2F126-4B4E-4536-920A-DD14FCDE8CB3@yahoo.co.uk> <3628f7a2-f9d6-f21c-9d66-1c37dea54f02@network-heretics.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/pRspk9t2mNOMKErNNUOeD2KNFXE>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards (NISTIR 8366)
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:57:28 -0000


> On Apr 30, 2021, at 3:49 AM, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4/30/21 5:07 AM, Lloyd W wrote:
> 
>> Version control belongs with the RFC Editor function, where the RFC Editor can reference the NIST document and provide a level of indirection and any added guidance.
> 
> +1

I read the NIST document and think it is very good, I agree we should us it.

+1 to the RFC Editor providing a current reference.    Over time, there may be other documents we may want to reference and think the RFC Editor could handle that as well.

Bob