Re: [Terminology] Update to TERM charter text

Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org> Tue, 13 April 2021 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <lists@digitaldissidents.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D583A0994 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pr3iBkxGZMEn for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E71F3A098D for <terminology@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 03:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: terminology@ietf.org
References: <8143F715-9D83-4C15-B441-D0D8CA302C50@eggert.org> <D5FEBE8C-14D4-48BD-AAE7-9436E296CB7E@eggert.org> <ed88e91a-1224-4918-710e-dfe6e5c89df4@digitaldissidents.org> <9191f3bd-d52a-4fa4-b117-79b3bb517cdf@www.fastmail.com>
From: Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>
Message-ID: <6a54335a-b033-60a1-a431-ba92954527cc@digitaldissidents.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:39:15 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9191f3bd-d52a-4fa4-b117-79b3bb517cdf@www.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 29cc722430e8f1f6ed904119444c0d49b0f3ee91
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.greenhost.nl
X-Scan-Signature: bc82d6a2e188773012c482ed32290af0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/vszCq1qhdJiNzqyDnw3MQkC5C1E>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Update to TERM charter text
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:39:25 -0000

On 13-04-2021 12:22, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Unfortunately, this "problem" is not restricted to GENDISPATCH.  I haven't even been in the IETF that long but I've seen multiple documents - drafts, charters, etc, be exposed to larger review and have the carefully crafted work of a working group be re-considered when it's exposed to a wider review.
> 
> Indeed, this is precisely the function of an IETF last-call - otherwise why do we bother sending work to the IESG for review?  We could just deliver every piece of careful "working group last call"ed document directly to the RFC editor with no cross-sectional review.
> 
> Of course, the flip side is that as a participant in the process, you can ask for the work to be brought back to GENDISPATCH to see whether there's consensus for the new document or not.  Or you could just object to charter in its current form I guess, I'm not sure how that works at IETF last-call stage.  One thing is for sure, the IETF processes aren't good at enforcing that the IETF goes ahead with the exact consensus product of a single working group, unchanged by wider review.

In my experience, IESG review brings up comments that are for the authors to fix, instead of IESG fixing them for you. 

Best,

Niels

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bron.
> 
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021, at 19:41, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>> Dear IESG,
>>
>> I am dismayed by the discussion in the IESG on the charter and the revisions that are proposed. The charter that was proposed was the product of long and complex discussions in GENDISPATCH. The review in the IESG is now rehashing those debates but changing the outcome. The changes in the charter are thus subvert the consensus that was carefully built. The proposed changes therefore undermine and jeopardize the work that the proposed WG could produce. 
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>> On 13-04-2021 08:46, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > there is now an -05 version that rolls in some additional feedback received yesterday: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-term/00-05/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-term/00-05/>
>> > 
>> > Diff at https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-term%2Fwithmilestones-00-04.txt&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-term%2Fwithmilestones-00-05.txt <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-term%2Fwithmilestones-00-04.txt&url2=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fcharter-ietf-term%2Fwithmilestones-00-05.txt>
>> > 
>> > Thanks,
>> > Lars
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>>
>> -- 
>> Niels ten Oever, PhD
>> Postdoctoral Researcher - Media Studies Department - University of Amsterdam
>> Research Fellow - Centre for Internet and Human Rights - European University Viadrina
>> Associated Scholar - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - Fundação Getúlio Vargas
>>
>> https://nielstenoever.net <https://nielstenoever.net> - mail@nielstenoever.net <mailto:mail%40nielstenoever.net> - @nielstenoever - +31629051853
>> PGP: 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
>>
>> Read my latest article on Internet infrastructure governance in New Media & Society here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444820929320 <https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444820929320>
>>
>> -- 
>> Terminology mailing list
>> Terminology@ietf.org <mailto:Terminology%40ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>
>>
> 
> --
>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>   brong@fastmailteam.com
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Niels ten Oever, PhD
Postdoctoral Researcher - Media Studies Department - University of Amsterdam
Research Fellow - Centre for Internet and Human Rights - European University Viadrina
Associated Scholar - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - Fundação Getúlio Vargas

https://nielstenoever.net - mail@nielstenoever.net - @nielstenoever - +31629051853
PGP: 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3

Read my latest article on Internet infrastructure governance in New Media & Society here: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1461444820929320