Re: [therightkey] [cabfpub] Thoughts on reducing SCT sizes (was Re: Updated Certificate Transparency + Extended Validation plan)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 18 February 2014 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95C11A0136 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:40:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8z4OW3u9TXwI for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C3A1A0150 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 10:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.70.10.63] (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D608F984; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:40:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <5303A920.2020406@fifthhorseman.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:40:32 -0500
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "certificate-transparency@googlegroups.com" <certificate-transparency@googlegroups.com>
References: <CABrd9STwBDxwB1vtmS9Ozb5e_7D=zfOqkOBeAaT2HG7X-cw5gw@mail.gmail.com> <04a001cf21cf$3a649190$af2db4b0$@digicert.com> <CAL9PXLyWFSfHz_230SkWLvr7sUROPv_k0rfKgmkMRRttk-EjGQ@mail.gmail.com> <52F2305C.5040107@comodo.com> <0b3f01cf228d$fef92e30$fceb8a90$@digicert.com> <CABrd9SR3+ByEMeXRpbMiwUatqNcoyjv=vHxgr1tdfE8p=oWH-g@mail.gmail.com> <E1BBA898-CC1E-47B5-878D-299099E71F25@entrust.com> <CABrd9SRDRzb+ZruoKbn4K5bE8bQY4k8=vi9yvj2HHtcJ97SHBQ@mail.gmail.com> <5303935D.4060206@fifthhorseman.net> <CABrd9ST1sFEdVuEq=2rREzuKKMqc0KD1cJX9YpwSyyLPBmcSFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9ST1sFEdVuEq=2rREzuKKMqc0KD1cJX9YpwSyyLPBmcSFg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XXR6i8CxIrxbCwJ7RFdpDRm2TDfEe59gg"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/therightkey/akuHAQNbJ2CxFg7ySWnhFpFB3LQ
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>, CABFPub <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] [cabfpub] Thoughts on reducing SCT sizes (was Re: Updated Certificate Transparency + Extended Validation plan)
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:40:41 -0000

On 02/18/2014 01:27 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 18 February 2014 17:07, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
>> Doesn't this reintroduce the perverse incentive to avoid killing a
>> known-misbehaving log?
 [...]
> That's not the rule. The rule is you need one SCT from a live log, and
> N SCTs from logs that were valid at the time of issue

Thanks.  That makes sense, and resolves my concern.

	--dkg