Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA721AE081 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:30:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gNT_4UvfIVKS for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x230.google.com (mail-ve0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD351AE066 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id oz11so6285886veb.35 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:30:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4kunb5xa+n30SdOK1vd/ql+FDJqdTTW3CQWz0MSePWY=; b=iS6bw1aLIely0ts0uXaGr1QxWsGbQQvFbY5BVYNAo/SCa0OT+VHTxMQw4XEHFaj9kF mAmbf8eC3uRVHCdiAr+cCYueAgl+VoMdwnF0Zb9udnnJYyopJuDKIJyf84zr/zTVVx2B +eM2Lg4mmGTCPdEXLzIKmWOk5eJRfsNfMMT/jy1naDcA9kclrz0y0KIQ8HrPG5f6V8Ul NcBQX0m86vxrOATXx9Ksd60xxO96Un7iSfTzRALbY2hrIs2w+hVy2t9rpKuV8r+o92Me xVE550cRJCSHAsGbD1QbswooEN6T8nezBAqz0P7EhJcGMJ4I8BMeK/65rtqpDiTPfFYt ddHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4kunb5xa+n30SdOK1vd/ql+FDJqdTTW3CQWz0MSePWY=; b=Wo6SkpTXozyr/EAyTz1mpS4hmRf7ZeEp2rDnI8+t+iwb6zFnoxmUx1xctBEcE5viPK fp38QD1VS0r0oPYNOfDDaobA7bf++lePyNaXkYdOrpL7hYLo5N4sA98il/eDSmCTbQem UjUZle4N/sOdqCEzEXjl0lBzEACtipu7gSSQlcXtJIgDHnxuGRcjMS0m1lbZ/ewpeqtv 7CBi8Mq4l5gvxrZZi1e/lKW0zsKh6TZASzHZKUmAd0Sbw7U/1Wf+ESYru8N4JixnklJa MoFwk5YtXrJyq3bcBG5oTaY0d3DNyHOKc2PFUyAPN2I0MjAs41CT+/V0X0insXG8R1+x dqKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlD8T8Ph+sXswv3RkFtZqYCv2G3HB0ijbYA+BfdjMuUR85Q6odw+0+gnPuvH4SqSOqY4w6mQEEqB4OB1CmuYwWiNCTDx0AMlRLKNOG0i6NpqK5cFH81h0a5pf0XKJfYJb///jl0lw2ur1vS39kolFQsTyJw8CLx0KxLQvyYs43AbM3bSOHO2q5FuhDMcTskvYMcly5/
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.118.36 with SMTP id kj4mr1189520veb.2.1386786618585; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:30:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.183.65 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:30:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312111248560.4894@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CABrd9SSzGJy18tf_iR5jFNk-sJyX66OPhmM4H23K5X2ZpWniyQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312111248560.4894@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:30:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SRs1PP2O4KJaq6zpdxAsR-7JpVMK_gwh8RXnLfwgQA+-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:30:25 -0000

On 11 December 2013 17:52, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>> Who's in?
>
>
> Yes, but...
>
>
>> "Problem statement: many Internet protocols require a mapping between
>> some kind of identifier and some kind of key, for example, HTTPS,
>> SMTPS, IPSec, DNSSEC and OpenPGP.
>
>
> This is protocol agnostic (good!)
>
>
>> Work items: Specify a standards-track mechanism to apply verifiable
>> logs to HTTP/TLS (i.e. RFC 6962-bis).
>
>
> This is not. I'd prefer to work towards a more generic
> method or infrastructure, but I assume the work item is
> just an example and not a limitation of the charter.

As the charter suggests, we will re-charter to include such things, as
they appear to become viable.

I am _very_ keen to come up with more generic mechanisms.

But I also have an urgent problem to solve.

They are not mutually exclusive.