IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Bakeoffs

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 17 April 2014 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DA51A010F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.871
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.871 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TMP25btUsJlN for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A0D1A0088 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 07:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2F028650 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:43:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com [172.17.50.21]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4579E2861C for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:43:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub6.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.22]) by prod-mail-relay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394FBFE054 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:43:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB6.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.22]) with mapi; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:42:59 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:42:59 -0400
Thread-Topic: Re: Bakeoffs
Thread-Index: Ac9aSyq5duSMnvQiS+aG1o/AlPwmag==
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120BCF2A30@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120BCF2A30USMBX1msgcorp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/-Lhe6jqtz7YucRm90jFVGGocXc0
Subject: Re: [TLS] Bakeoffs
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 14:43:05 -0000

I got some questions off-list about my comments on "not meeting the charter."  I should clarify.

It's okay if we aren't able to meet all the goals of the charter.  I could charter a WG to solve the four-color map problem and prove P=NP, and conclude with only one goal met.  :)

                /r$

--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technology
Cambridge, MA

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email