IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Comments on TLS identity protection

badra <badra@isima.fr> Wed, 20 December 2006 11:15 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzPb-0006Ui-66; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:15:03 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzPZ-0006Qo-Jy for tls@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:15:01 -0500
Received: from sp.isima.fr ([193.55.95.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwzPY-00026B-8t for tls@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:15:01 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pc158.isima.fr [193.55.95.158]) by sp.isima.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id MAA63902 ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:13:28 +0100
Message-ID: <45891B1D.9060500@isima.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:14:37 +0100
From: badra <badra@isima.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
Subject: Re: [TLS] Comments on TLS identity protection
References: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24038FD4C3@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24038FD4C3@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by sp.isima.fr id MAA63902
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: tls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com a écrit :
> However, it seems that the reasons why the existing feature is
> not used have nothing to do with poor performance. And if the
> existing mechanism doesn't have a performance problem, optimizing
> it would be premature (and thus "root of all evil" :-).
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
>   


Hi Pasi,

Other reasons are included in my last mail for why double handshake 
isn't good enough, optimization is one of them.

Best regards,
Badra


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email