Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 16 October 2017 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5EC13202D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQhKTKddfIsy for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDE661270AE for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DFFBE64; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:30:35 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtHSX9FjiqxH; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:30:34 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45657BE5C; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:30:34 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1508196634; bh=cDHpGevv3olxK+IKfGzM1qg68EZRJLMfYU+RlfP8L5Y=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=wg9IOVsM3loedvauGXmC7rOzDHbdvu/FWH+L+8DFDj7ULApZLgdY2l9t1thJz0Ly9 zL8p+sV/YZio8P4NO6waet/vhxmn7qmNX+O5tW41oDR02qpjRIEVGjfioz/2Wa8osx JNI3G2KSHkhEvdAj6b0aB9aeTWqgiBYrxjBxfvBg=
To: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
References: <7E6C8F1F-D341-456B-9A48-79FA7FEC0BC1@gmail.com> <2530307.EziazPmtDQ@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <03d1ea01-d6d7-bf2b-89ed-97a8a270a62e@cs.tcd.ie> <2421126.h5uzTUJ9N8@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <4f47756b-3627-ff08-a7f6-8d6bd9e7fb5b@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:30:33 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2421126.h5uzTUJ9N8@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FI1QUTbgNjVNwmrc1RT01bf1mtWGaKFcc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Gc6W0j6yAJhyMPjuzEkhocaaytY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 23:30:38 -0000

Hiya,

On 13/10/17 17:28, Hubert Kario wrote:
>> So I think this ends up as bad as the design in draft-rehired. Which
>> of them is more obviously bad is another question.

> "draft-rehired"?

Apologies. That's how I've been verbalising/pronouncing
draft-rhrd. (*) I think it is useful to have a name that
can be pronounced, and I refuse to abuse language and talk
about this as if "visibility" was even an approximately
correct term;-)

S.

(*) I do have a weak justification:-)

        $ grep "^r.h.r.d" /usr/share/dict/words
        rehired
        $