Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie-00.txt
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 09 July 2018 16:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276FA130E88 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CDstEDZCiAM6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x241.google.com (mail-yb0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C138130DCE for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x241.google.com with SMTP id y11-v6so7447671ybm.7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 09:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6XQsZ/yKVqpYE7HH6eUi7UefnS75sCe6XzZvKnpsqG0=; b=aa4iAZnGZtye7K5secfk4rvuiLXt5AscjpR99kvyhESgy/6CEb4JFmsVZ2pcRsNkBW stD5u1IjspqoeUidg0leEKtQvNoRvXqC6yTMyGhv5vxz8aDqUyhSQnYO6wAjIxB7Xsd8 Vb2YoupphkLCF1eUf9JTZbDzN5Kty4rLHEyie6/GPBn6yRITyxVLJNrzmC1v+LI+bqqt IeMZxtY3FDUXsMF0G3dFAv28hfyhHYCRc/nHF7tbhqPjja4wuGepmdmJ0TNGlPMuu1pW AQq7AxGTGSNFR3JCS+oOpCpI5/dDIgjHmBQZR7UIjFc65ZxAnYHWoRQnTZCpiVcdPTZU Gn+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6XQsZ/yKVqpYE7HH6eUi7UefnS75sCe6XzZvKnpsqG0=; b=sn3h6LaL9PooNU0Uqw3N/IBBlDf2tdk1Wbi5Xam1sN9VNYl4tf9etgc02uuLcnqxEV NMF/RX/NmmZgTtop8cfXz8s5sFf3lfOX1VXITmtDbp4BCIFxpIr6JJd/dPurbjZ/OZkd m3dESbeBP785tOn70zp2/v7BjBrBY0DWlESGB6+5yTEUglh28Gsnmln39nVkTwhQpwK9 XII3k4vaY9dl8+g4BiGV8X1Qvb9gzOz0SSVVpS2+kebSryXJEAP/f4jje9wW0WxonRGO BUJlgXVH7aMN8jT/N+5+3xbyEpWgmk+vSC5jHZKfDYkU1aq/pTarN9BGd6TPEYX3hK1L luGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0Axty0uDGJ5kww3/lDMOtm3aiiSGBLuNMCgoz9wmDW265N+q6O +e4aUDzVDQyODzRDAGb6PMJY7JU0dQizuPuOFYbeKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd6s8tAiIm7/F0doIKwqn2yHwm4pi+rTA0dqz6GN0V99QPpWHSOdtqmq/oZcWaJ0NjDsV+69qh1wWnshg9qhsM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:adcb:: with SMTP id d11-v6mr11777994ybe.73.1531155489947; Mon, 09 Jul 2018 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a81:6b83:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 09:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBN4RPt_=zu-PTPeaYbQ4KxC8DAf=a7359pZDjYavpxecw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <152934875755.3094.4484881874912460528.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHbuEH5J-F2cKag02Vx416jsy1N6XZOju28H99WAt71Pc5optg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBN4RPt_=zu-PTPeaYbQ4KxC8DAf=a7359pZDjYavpxecw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 09:57:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBMzweULuOfxe_Dp7n6M7Lt77_1Qq92=KzfmuBeShUSCDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000131308057093eb39"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/K2vIZyJVvfpKSOqFffadNXQPFoc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 16:58:14 -0000
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > Thanks for writing this. > > I would be in favor of deprecating old versions of TLS prior to 1.2. > Firefox Telemetry shows that about 1% of our connections are TLS 1.1 > This should be 1.0. (on the same data set, TLS 1.3 is > 5%), and TLS 1.1 is negligible. > > This is probably a higher number than we'd be comfortable turning off > immediately, but it is probably worth starting the process. > > -Ekr > > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Kathleen Moriarty < > kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Stephen and I posted the draft below to see if the TLS working group >> is ready to take steps to deprecate TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1. There has >> been a recent drop off in usage for web applications due to the PCI >> Council recommendation to move off TLSv1.0, with a recommendation to >> go to TLSv1.2 by June 30th. NIST has also been recommending TLSv1.2 >> as a baseline. Applications other than those using HTTP may not have >> had the same reduction in usage. If you are responsible for services >> where you have a reasonable vantage point to gather and share >> statistics to assess usage further, that could be helpful for the >> discussion. We've received some feedback that has been incorporated >> into the working draft and feelers in general have been positive. It >> would be good to know if there are any show stoppers that have not >> been considered. >> >> https://github.com/sftcd/tls-oldversions-diediedie >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Kathleen >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> Date: Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:05 PM >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie-00.txt >> To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Kathleen Moriarty >> <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Stephen Farrell and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie >> Revision: 00 >> Title: Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1 >> Document date: 2018-06-18 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 10 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moriarty-tls-oldv >> ersions-diediedie-00.txt >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moriarty-tls-oldversi >> ons-diediedie/ >> Htmlized: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie-00 >> Htmlized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-moriarty-tls-old >> versions-diediedie >> >> >> Abstract: >> This document [if approved] formally deprecates Transport Layer >> Security (TLS) versions 1.0 [RFC2246] and 1.1 [RFC4346] and moves >> these documents to the historic state. These versions lack support >> for current and recommended cipher suites, and various government and >> industry profiiles of applications using TLS now mandate avoiding >> these old TLS versions. TLSv1.2 has been the recommended version for >> IETF protocols since 2008, providing sufficient time to transition >> away from older versions. Products having to support older versions >> increase the attack surface unnecessarily and increase opportunities >> for misconfigurations. Supporting these older versions also requires >> additional effort for library and product maintenance. >> >> This document updates the backward compatibility sections of TLS RFCs >> [[list TBD]] to prohibit fallback to TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1. This >> document also updates RFC 7525. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Kathleen >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > >
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Hubert Kario
- [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Version… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… nalini elkins
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Eric Rescorla
- [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-mor… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Alessandro Ghedini
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Eric Mill
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… David Benjamin
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Phil Pennock
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] [CAUTION] Re: Fwd: New Version Notifica… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… nalini elkins
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] raising ceiling vs. floor (was: New Ver… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] [CAUTION] Re: Fwd: New Version Notifica… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… David Benjamin
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… nalini elkins
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Christopher Wood
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Artyom Gavrichenkov
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft… Artyom Gavrichenkov