IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] sect571r1

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Wed, 15 July 2015 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6521B2C2D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCOyZCOTdGvK for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACDDB1B2C2C for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagw2 with SMTP id w2so32056966lag.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SzwQ4F5yGG0TrpbvBRKERikofq7++6h+tviVGzqUP18=; b=PdTI7Wdvy4jNrqKqOk7XGyAm64AJXJ+IS8bJWISH7iAPJC2EUDi/Tyg39BId8zR4MF kGd33l7x6NBz5+ZVhWqXmiuDo1QR7EtF4Qu3H9nMuAz9EoWx8jVN2JotagBFz8vexo1i 80bLXqbII7gPFoq8TUMeLtwwRRBfL6UUh9BNNDclrFgghewg+ep7Efm4YzN7p6+UpUJE 24uxD02Wra8/0BwxrImtuFAzbFQkEUPPz68IEx90/ggg4PbJhiN2bM4WY3px37A5bDsT Xdrvp/7WSPZFy8wJiihwMLuWKMTtcgjJo6ddBFFzekxLU8g+B6dnFodlh2MqJYg3QRl7 yHkQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.143.74 with SMTP id sc10mr692889lbb.116.1436993966269; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.89.69 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFR824yu2QiZ=-kR4JxhbxgvSJhi33Jq9s6v4T9qedOzKfrrfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201507151413.22408.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <CAFR824yu2QiZ=-kR4JxhbxgvSJhi33Jq9s6v4T9qedOzKfrrfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:59:26 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: v8NcCP9_2c1p_hR0KyJ0dDExTjk
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9XBzxKDbomTXuMwjge8MPtcg97wyXdp=KRJxNn4j9tbCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Deirdre Connolly <durumcrustulum@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/dhy9uoc_wpPap0-jn8vbFMV7kg8>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] sect571r1
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:59:29 -0000

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Deirdre Connolly
<durumcrustulum@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So, should it stay or should it go now? Opinions?
>
> +1 that sect571r1 be removed.

I also believe that it should be removed.


Cheers

AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email