[TLS] Re: FATT Process Updates: Contacting FATT

Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@symbolic.software> Tue, 28 April 2026 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <nadim@symbolic.software>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E2EE4B99B5 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1777380311; bh=uavwn952025fe7RJq7dEOD0VDpJJmNEM0y8DJeiCYwc=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=Q4iI0/Xdh0JqozsmDZn2MPX8D6g3xqHsDtBpC5fy2R5lsDk9A28EYAAppkvtWydrv MYpA+wrmRDOe4DRuVymycCxh4Znoc3PORrlqxSw+6sIOMLMebFKUf06lLfh/RrpC24 SBfGv4OMMxpspBX5JcmQ8rr4GY7WZgy6AKFpefr4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=symbolic.software header.b="f+HuqPzC"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="YwuWJqzh"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WBoGoPhNfnlG for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.149]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDD5E4B91A1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB87DEC00BF; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:38:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= symbolic.software; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1777379925; x=1777466325; bh=w9uGTfeGB1GjJ9+n3/bLpbfIMlU8uDdfa9Mnn2g74bg=; b= f+HuqPzCQCDc4b9EEgtvO4STdVCyayMVxUUETjHn/E7zKruFL4sbnu+8mPfUA+X8 PZt1vizSLKBExIEh+xAiSkF9m1LjYwJjKat9IGaj5HrhSeKzm39ZV2OCpokN3Afg TjPiyBfPu/rrK0wsrKrTXvj9j/s+t9T1Sj0zUW5TweUhE5JjIUVbOqxINesNgFvB mAD+Dv6QnbqEIeGp6B+XkeMaDzTy8s+0gU7obt2mwtb6luAFLiUBHOf8LQ7q/QGG o6x0nY1FQphU/8gmTXWAUI78xrNT0QpWJ9QSmR6qDw9fbCWmcN2US2P1tHND9LEt BTYKazw1PefZijhOuQIeHA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1777379925; x=1777466325; bh=w9uGTfeGB1GjJ9+n3/bLpbfIMlU8uDdfa9M nn2g74bg=; b=YwuWJqzh8lF+RsQgakx+QLGKEMlQmtCEC855le31UHIhOTcR/X0 0uQDQjWg+Fne2qfJaJjMXjbTnekvjvH8L7ullVS4bmeQpRmPuFOMDaeOyhO0BRDx Nq+NGKDZjQOBAso+e6bUXixYkgyXoIm+6b79bISJIvzx6pZnZ5KrjogfkGzZvOsd s/NC0zCAkfJdjut8r+aIJX3khPlpCsBoB9smbRwBceewiEjVjIlnQyOLQF3IvD4g djW6RuYXCCJlD0XpzGmDTdbuzAf128W76y37Urg/JWecMIry7fB2lkLwwZH+fsAj XKeU3mXR5je5VMUH+kDOabKwiXjMQRCOtgA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Varwabb7h9v9f6hFIyHq5HMljeNmOhww_to67C2S_WwPOBVb8DJTHw> <xme:VarwaeubayKGWdQIP-yQL745PRak9bWOBbyIDO80R2i0ycLXmjDjacZtJaPObMrJl 9JDsn61FkoIyjD29sT8Uq8vUxakKizq5ZYFinmCqEX8wmw0VyFIRxQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:VarwadE3H7jI4VKPl2dWQfR5WxAMGqyP6NqSTL0ZInY3txaaRbh1gRuxyj_xJNNPlKpsRGnDXE_IpJE-tMMKyd5mbO7OGteERXPSefatv3xmPFIz1eob3gUUGA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdekudehkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhkfgtggfuffgjvefvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpefprgguihhmucfm ohgsvghishhsihcuoehnrgguihhmsehshihmsgholhhitgdrshhofhhtfigrrhgvqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtudffheetleehhfeugfeiheeltdevieduudduteevtdffheel geetieegtdfggeenucffohhmrghinhepshihmhgsohhlihgtrdhsohhfthifrghrvgenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnrgguihhm sehshihmsgholhhitgdrshhofhhtfigrrhgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhmohguvg epshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehrshgrlhiisegrkhgrmhgrihdrtghomhdprhgt phhtthhopehlihhnkhgvrhhfvghlihigsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepth hlshesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VarwaZyB7tXRx3lHfa1SCgKB9F3M8AV_f8lsqQ78nMJVaFEA9VKw8g> <xmx:VarwachfTVf6oPWzP67rsh4ldJvBKGnw2zXBv9UqxDOEegpUKROLzg> <xmx:Varwacz7KVVhGDF8L-IvEfABL-x4WL54oIbfD0BbWVvQuY0tZmjm6w> <xmx:VarwaXL5im1pFvNRZBeMh6Sx2XcZF8Ka-pU6mX7Qhqo7WRzPfalKFQ> <xmx:VarwadzGl7dPrejOOGI8Yfu50bd8d1jDrlisM10sHpDcM3E2qIo-7PEP>
Feedback-ID: i6d3949ed:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:38:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@symbolic.software>
Message-Id: <A841A880-680A-431F-93EA-F9AAC60387B2@symbolic.software>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_43EB8BF4-0E2C-4C55-BA1B-387BC22A9424"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\))
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:38:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR17MB4031F4E463FC4924D544C1E2CD372@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <143FA1BF-280A-4469-ADE0-7CAE3867DB88@sn3rd.com> <9759b289-15aa-4cae-a306-258873b90f07@tu-dresden.de> <80CE4119-79F9-40B2-82FF-2D6E2BFE967C@sn3rd.com> <b3d2495c-ca82-420c-9bb8-8f5766f1c94a@tu-dresden.de> <CABcZeBOnzwNnu=joUfzfD30T3PbTwbDJE_+70g8+mpJ1ZON6Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwVa+RK4sNTTCkBL+tKTohtzvSVkf7W9HJ3jbrJXDTdKQ@mail.gmail.com> <4ffb0756-1cfe-41a6-8f26-c0fb4daecaed@tu-dresden.de> <CAChr6SwmyLX6UJiq5bdoveDEVEsvY6r9Kzf5Zp3iXr6MhPRLyw@mail.gmail.com> <b6fc4367-0015-4538-aa6d-5a3816eb1c41@tu-dresden.de> <CAChr6SxJHG=iyNKsy47uimbqg-L1b9yZUy0JYHp=Dx6hy0-Mcg@mail.gmail.com> <f878a04f-f30f-4dfe-a113-a84f198ebf27@tu-dresden.de> <CAChr6Sz1tyjYsc7Stp3_KELm467sP2d7-p2-QMReAZN_aZmrrQ@mail.gmail.com> <eb7d6206-076f-47f4-ada4-47b00b6b1f76@tu-dresden.de> <MN2PR17MB403149D17EF6158950DA6C25CD362@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <3897d5de-e09b-4c07-bd3c-6c1b0b385f22@app.fastmail.com> <306aec2b-935a-4d2f-8e1d-a80b11957fec@tu-dresden.de> <F2F1A850-FDD1-4E81-829D-AA6AE63F45EE@symbolic.software> <CAPeSryqZKBUDpEOFNW5hUD9B-mJzXa2hz_t6iUP8k-k-uOT=XQ@mail.gmail.com> <4e49e1f8-d608-423a-a9a2-1f21d96df1d9@app.fastmail.com> <MN2PR17MB4031F7958C3F9264DEA16AD9CD372@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <34BCAB33-8513-487A-AB58-C86E7A884B45@symbolic.software> <MN2PR17MB4031F4E463FC4924D544C1E2CD372@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.500.181)
Message-ID-Hash: OALFSRSHFCDC7PKQPFRHOKNNZ54NQOLZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: OALFSRSHFCDC7PKQPFRHOKNNZ54NQOLZ
X-MailFrom: nadim@symbolic.software
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Felix Linker <linkerfelix@gmail.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: FATT Process Updates: Contacting FATT
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/w9DgnA6GEjQFsXzgwntXq_lPGpc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

But we’re not discussing security here! We’re discussing procedural norms and practices when it comes to how a community effort is run.

This is about how the WG interacts with FATT.

I care about TLS and about how formal methods are used to assess something, and I care even more about the trustworthiness of public institutions that aim to secure the Internet.

So yes, I think transparency is obviously something we should all be championing.

Nadim Kobeissi
Symbolic Software • https://symbolic.software

> On 28 Apr 2026, at 2:37 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> This is genuinely confusing. Are you pushing for *less* transparency? I don’t get it.
> 
> Security is all about trade-offs.
> 
> I am not pushing for “less” transparency than we have now. I am okay with the current transparency/engagement trade-off for now.  I hope it will change later on.
>