IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Can't send mail to Cenk (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

Glen <glen@amsl.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <glen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3D33A0D66 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:03:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1iECpns6S-5 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35BA13A0D47 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E0F3C2F57 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.86.10] (173-8-133-94-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.133.94]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3DC23C2F56 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:03:30 -0800 (PST)
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20201211094836.3E2663A0880@ietfa.amsl.com> <93628091-1A48-4865-A100-F64DE5981ECF@tzi.org> <3EC702BF-BBA5-42F6-90A7-33EAEBE3E677@eggert.org> <1ee731cf-e21b-21bd-b4ce-961c64a5541a@amsl.com> <B2C31716-4815-45EA-B099-B0AB5C697546@tzi.org>
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Organization: AMS
Message-ID: <b23b380a-6280-0ddc-7c8f-b2f99b7c88a9@amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:03:29 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B2C31716-4815-45EA-B099-B0AB5C697546@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/4KQRiNTTz5gYBiYoL3q0f65CLU0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Can't send mail to Cenk (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:03:33 -0000

On 12/11/2020 10:00, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I’m sure quite a few mail servers will croak on the v6 address of the second server, and maybe even on the v4 addresses.

Carsten -

They won't.  Only the first server is live and resolving.  If we ever 
had to bring an alternative server online, the DNS would be updated 
automatically and the new server would take the old server's place. The 
DNS you're seeing now is just "backup" records.

Glen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email