IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Can't send mail to Cenk (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81713A0EF2 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:34:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d02p7xyGNBmA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A373A0ED6 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.10.196] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66D712BF8A; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:34:22 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1607718862; bh=AU9CfJtAWd+wBquGMSYaMMdlbZv6rbvf88qSh5Mdv5E=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=JUfR/S1j4N2QZYVzSOUXk9/gOS4OeG/MWqA5N7gVq6tweTXkz+Toq+LUuUEACBDcg kKwSzBZ7QM7uTXeRU4chBboa0lV7GyM50D2hQi8REmzjhKMUZDEsISGizSDX4OuK9m o5E3FJKKczAniD6/tV8tKO13MBWtdMkqF9PRLlVEfqIKNFd1JBiffONA0Y4RdZSVZR WIUjTwSSelA8ifXavw/wt+cJxi/JQgMPcV4QLehWzlAml5gVR3XkyQVLD/1LXqsE8d hqgMK9BH0VC0174gAs/Y1ZK9azb4Nalkd8+n0zG/ts2RDlpuEkdJtOLXeuR/QxurAk 7IH0nXrrZ9lSg==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <ff8687db-c2f9-a4a2-d2dc-5c53a664b73f@taugh.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 15:34:21 -0500
Cc: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8D1B23C8-549F-45EC-99C6-FA6A55179F71@bangj.com>
References: <20201211183328.C2BDF2979A3F@ary.qy> <461.1607713827@localhost> <50c0527d-4676-d485-382e-c967035798ea@levkowetz.com> <a8f64c28-3ef2-71da-ee4d-3ef87adb17c@taugh.com> <92A33A0F-7571-46AB-9CD4-BC193E545881@akamai.com> <DF60BD2F-8538-48BE-916A-8CE9A240FE7A@bangj.com> <ff8687db-c2f9-a4a2-d2dc-5c53a664b73f@taugh.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/cCceeEOrZcwiLXT__rn17VF78A0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Can't send mail to Cenk (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 20:34:33 -0000

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 3:24 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
>> From someone who runs my own mail server, it bugs me that my address gets rewritten.
> 
> That's because you publish a DMARC policy with p=quarantine.  Change it to p=none and the rewriting will stop.
> 
> For small personal domains, DMARC policies other than p=none cause lots of problems and solve none.  If your name were Paypal, the advice would be different.
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine

Thanks!

Add that to an IETF FAQ somewhere please.

Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email