Re: [Tools-discuss] Can't send mail to Cenk (Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender)

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Glen! Do these addresses by chance have a common DNS name? Would make the setup a bit easier.

-- 
Sent from a mobile device; please excuse typos.

> On Dec 11, 2020, at 19:24, Glen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 12/11/2020 01:57, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>> On 2020-12-11, at 11:51, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> This went to mail=2Bietf=[e-mail], and I thought that was all that is needed to get mail out.
>> I have seen similar errors recently. I ended up allowing 4.31.198.44 as a sender for eggert.org.
> 
> I can't speak to the errors or the rewriting portion of this, because that is all a part of the Postconfirm system, and others here are better able to speak authoritatively to how it was designed and should work.
> 
> But to this point:
> 
>> allowing 4.31.198.44 as a sender
> 
> I just want to clarify that those individuals who wish to whitelist the IETF's servers in SPF (or elsewhere) should include six addresses in their list, to account for our virtual host cluster:
> 
> 4.31.198.44
> 2001:1900:3001:11::2c
> 4.31.198.41
> 2001:1900:3001:11::29
> 192.95.54.41
> 2607:5300:60:9ccf::29
> 
> Thanks,
> Glen
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> Please report datatracker.ietf.org and mailarchive.ietf.org
> bugs at http://tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb
> or send email to [e-mail]
> 
> Please report tools.ietf.org bugs at
> http://tools.ietf.org/tools/issues
> or send email to [e-mail]