Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (was: I-D statistics)
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 16 March 2024 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B21EC14F619 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0cSNC0v5h2X for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A770C14F618 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [202.4.29.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Txw5X1lwlzDCbY; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:59:59 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPi9ALxTDUPe+5Y-_OS_1VuUuuf3n1ax8nkB6oY36io8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 07:59:45 +1000
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF7F026F-BA52-438C-8789-6C7A5ACA0D5F@tzi.org>
References: <1952067F-6467-4BEC-9CA5-BB8B16FA662B@tzi.org> <14807.1709682543@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <effb521c-1e20-cff8-acd3-17212a6b3fb9@gmail.com> <447A96F55A3D36851570B3B6@PSB> <60f18950-a2e0-16be-3a05-33f9a637062d@gmail.com> <CABcZeBPzYvscB3yeaRYQg6waR1BvqQMhJ+GpoKAZThoDvREs+w@mail.gmail.com> <ZfYOMEGdrGaz3BXB@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CABcZeBPi9ALxTDUPe+5Y-_OS_1VuUuuf3n1ax8nkB6oY36io8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/60bZ-T0d1MJC4Sb4oVZN9-Rp8ck>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (was: I-D statistics)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 22:00:11 -0000
On 17. Mar 2024, at 07:34, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > https://github.com/mattduck/gh2md > https://rewind.com/blog/three-ways-to-backup-your-github-issues/ > https://github.com/dwyl/github-backup Nice! Now WIBNI someone evaluated these against a putative set of IETF objectives, and made some personal recommendation what to use? (I’m not volunteering either of us for that, but maybe some of the WGs that use GitHub extensively can find someone. And of course somebody else can then look at similar work for the other forges they like, the most relevant of which seem to be gitlab and codeberg at the moment.) Grüße, Carsten
- [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Martin Thomson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics John C Klensin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… John C Klensin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? Jean Mahoney
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Jay Daley
- Re: [Tools-discuss] I-D statistics Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… John C Klensin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… John C Klensin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? (w… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? John C Klensin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? Julian Reschke
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? John C Klensin
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Why post text and not XML? Eric Rescorla