Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps: chat service trials
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 15 December 2020 15:36 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA9A3A11DE for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:36:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.668
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.668 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKGRNMai1fbF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr (smtp4-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 346E83A11E7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 07:36:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e59:ce10::da3d:a356] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e59:ce10::da3d:a356]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589A619F522 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:36:05 +0100 (CET)
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <f167ecf1-07f8-2f6c-31c8-0e9c2079e14d@nostrum.com> <04dd1d7d-8ee3-d5c0-d02b-059b007acb63@nostrum.com> <d0eef915-4893-79f2-6834-4e6dbb1e50e2@gmail.com> <3b673eec-3031-bbc8-6fd7-03f9180cfb0d@nostrum.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <28d2c1d6-6e1e-b788-54e8-8ff75454fd19@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 16:36:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3b673eec-3031-bbc8-6fd7-03f9180cfb0d@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/6QMUJsYCaZ0qWj63RX7o94h4v_U>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps: chat service trials
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 15:36:11 -0000
Le 14/12/2020 à 20:38, Robert Sparks a écrit : [...] > For convenience: > > https://zulip-trial1.ietf.org, https://matrix-trial1.ietf.org and > https://xmpp-trial1.ietf.org Zulip responds when clicked. Matrix and xmpp dont; are they on IPv6? (I am on an IPv6-only computer) Alex > > Those are detailed more thoroughly in the announcements you can re-read at > > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/?q="trial chat" > > >> >>> If you've used the services, please take a few minutes to provide >>> feedback at tools-discuss@ietf.org. >> >> This is a good point. I wonder whether there can be an automated >> forwarding between lists that have a certain common interest? E.g. when >> I post here with 'tools' in the Subject line it also gets there, and >> vice-versa with 'couches'. > The zulip instance ingests a few mailing lists, but that bridge is not > bi-directional. There are different modes of conversation with email and > chat - the email reflection of chat would look similar to an email > reflection of a jabber room - not a very pleasant way to consume or > participate in the chat. >> >> Alex >> >>> >>> RjS >>> >>> >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Next steps: chat >>> service trials Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:00:58 -0600 From: Robert >>> Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Reply-To: tools-discuss >>> <tools-discuss@ietf.org> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> We have been running trial zulip, matrix, and xmpp services since >>> October. See >>> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-announce/?q=%22trial%20chat%22> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> As noted in those announcements, the issue that we are trying to >>> address is the difficulty people have been reporting obtaining >>> jabber services and clients. We are hopeful that these trials will >>> help the community develop a better sense of whether to focus on >>> improving the experiences with xmpp or to pursue other chat >>> solutions. We are also open to the possibility that these other >>> solutions may be worth operating in addition to improving the >>> experiences from xmpp. >>> >>> However, usage and feedback so far has not been sufficient to inform >>> what services we should run in the future. >>> >>> We had around 50 local jabber accounts created on >>> xmpp-trial1.ietf.org, and around 40 accounts were created on each of >>> the matrix and zulip services. Few rooms have been created on the >>> matrix service other than those bridging to xmpp. Few streams were >>> created on the zulip service other than those bridging to xmpp and >>> those ingesting a few mailing lists. >>> >>> We are not aware of anyone trying to use the zulip or matrix servers >>> for ietf work outside the main meeting. >>> >>> If you've used the services, please take a few minutes to provide >>> feedback at tools-discuss@ietf.org. >>> >>> Is providing local jabber accounts and a web interface to jabber >>> sufficient? Are there features that matrix or zulip provide that are >>> truly helpful for progressing IETF work? If so, please describe how >>> they are helping. >>> >>> To collect more feedback, we are planning to extend the trials >>> through IETF 110. Please take advantage of these services between >>> now and then (at interim meetings for example) and let us know what >>> you find to be effective. >>> >>> If you are interested in using these services more directly for your >>> group's day-to-day communication, and are willing to test one or both >>> of these services on a primary basis for a while, please coordinate >>> with the appropriate leadership and let the tools team know so we can >>> help accommodate. Please consider using these services for ad-hoc, >>> design-team meetings, and even interims (again, coordinating with the >>> appropriate leadership). >>> >>> If you have had issues using Jabber in the past, please take some >>> time now to work with these new services and describe whether they >>> improve your experience. >>> >>> We need more feedback about these services to develop a sense of >>> what will best meet the community's needs going forward. Please >>> engage in exploring and discussing them at tools-discuss@ietf.org. >>> >>> While exploring, feel free to use the trial1-feedback room on Matrix >>> and the trial1-feedback stream on Zulip. >>> >>> Thanks again to the volunteers that have been helping configure >>> these services and keep them going. >>> >>> Robert Sparks, Tools Team Chair >>> >>> _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce >>> mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Manycouches mailing >>> list Manycouches@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Manycouches mailing list > Manycouches@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manycouches
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Next steps: chat service tria… Jim Fenton
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Next steps: chat service tria… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Next steps: chat service tria… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps… Glen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps… John Levine