IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps: chat service trials

Glen <glen@amsl.com> Wed, 16 December 2020 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <glen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CCE3A0E74 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMA9IhA5nChy for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF7683A0E77 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD3938A061 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.86.10] (173-8-133-94-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.133.94]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3893B388330 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:09 -0800 (PST)
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20201215223104.0157C29FEA01@ary.qy>
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Organization: AMS
Message-ID: <915c82d9-96a8-6f2c-5e2d-347d05870b65@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 20:14:10 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201215223104.0157C29FEA01@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Mu6wf25ae_m8sLzL9F71HaMOGBQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [Manycouches] Fwd: Next steps: chat service trials
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 04:14:16 -0000

On 12/15/2020 14:31, John Levine wrote:
> In article <28d2c1d6-6e1e-b788-54e8-8ff75454fd19@gmail.com> you write:
>> Zulip responds when clicked.  Matrix and xmpp dont; are they on IPv6?
> Apparently not.
> $ telnet matrix-trial1.ietf.org 443
>> (I am on an IPv6-only computer)

Hmph.  That's disappointing.  I've poked this, and made an adjustment 
which seems to have solved this.  The other two trials are now on IPV6 
as well.

> Can we not have this religious argument again, please?

No need (although this made me smile!)   This was a... "non-religious 
problem", and I have fixed it. :-)

Glen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email