IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 10 May 2014 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7154E1A025C for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 May 2014 07:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzox5OFPe9PF for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 May 2014 07:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7461A0020 for <trans@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 May 2014 07:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id A305B165ADC; Sat, 10 May 2014 14:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay08.akamai.com (unknown [172.27.22.71]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BD9165ACD; Sat, 10 May 2014 14:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub7.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.23]) by prod-mail-relay08.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5B298069; Sat, 10 May 2014 14:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.79]) by usma1ex-cashub7.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.23]) with mapi; Sat, 10 May 2014 10:52:22 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 10:52:17 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)
Thread-Index: Ac9sBXTyWYWvBBe+TuG/p9zvq8w2nQAWdw/Q
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7130A13ECA0@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAK3OfOjRg3B69WBhcVxCFZBZt3LeOz_F=giqT37+FUPC+OxTwA@mail.gmail.com> <D8E4B721-E4C1-4CC2-8FCF-343EE197ED79@taoeffect.com> <536D9816.1070008@gmail.com> <7719F0ED-7188-4B57-BEE6-245FD0314D36@taoeffect.com> <536DA145.6050305@gmail.com> <A1536ACA-245A-4D29-9A4B-72649C8227AB@taoeffect.com>
In-Reply-To: <A1536ACA-245A-4D29-9A4B-72649C8227AB@taoeffect.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7130A13ECA0USMBX1msgcorp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/wsimBc25tPe6aWY0fQj06nWi6B0
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] On the worthiness of DNSSEC and PKI (Re: DNSSEC also needs CT)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 14:52:30 -0000

Ø  What do I do if the problems are fundamental to the design of CT and the solution is to do something else?

Write up your own document and circulate it.  I'll be happy to give you some pointers to the second part, once you have the first part.

--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge, MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me<mailto:rsalz@jabber.me>; Twitter: RichSalz

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email