IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sun, 24 May 2020 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C247A3A0811 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 03:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKgsnaid9Igc for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 03:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC263A05A4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 03:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a25so6113637ljp.3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 03:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ne/WdhTVpf7JM1/vVQnGs3QZS960aLxejEf/TCnud8s=; b=czDe8po46iBwffS85RKj33uaAVsYla9dH/QYoA8Jd6WrH8JQ0rEMPRL4wgy8v2aVCM GeoEHJMnUwUJxGqvBaslfGSxp9dkMvATkIfRtmKCUdb8D1FIsSESC91THg5QaIawx3uo j+EGapbRBRjUPPanTOwbPNqhSBi4Dh18sZfuIvZANl8HGvBUy4vQxdUf5cjjj4ihMcKt 1rxhdIPE56BLS1Yg2yllDO1VoOkNbP+wCwbx69De8DI+DY3UiyiZwCLBVVpXQZIz5vnG pYhZwJh1IcMra8fJW32Jrgfp00ckz5bm0qC3gohYhzGBXeea9wxRY/YrvdbgImxzi/Am Yzxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ne/WdhTVpf7JM1/vVQnGs3QZS960aLxejEf/TCnud8s=; b=fYGn16FZEBJVmA2QsYQhU0B6eWXQc/ISNHeyutKVr04F1jLip2TmFRpvU2YpYrMNRW ue6ItcyXnGXfubAWjuv46MZDT5mAsS4+Ek+FgBR+WXswTjiDWY8viKTYjsQM6xZZ2IXn xb9ova1rXYdKcxcUz9C11djnBIY13ex9wqidQihNmlROilbcoemOB7MEUjGM9aYqdYwK O5xCjTbqRpKDY1SggtkKSEndfBfYqfULdornA8PKdOBuhtHcXSXRSvHbi03iVnvi9wpe ZpWKfYmaox5LGEj+SjiYy9y4x890RSYj4RnqiX/rwkFKInUwedNgA4v9jDS8TnrR1nEF LxDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QHp4lCAs6crV26USiAXK9MhiuMra9GAn2CU49amZpjWoF1BpB Ko6GRH0x+sg7Fxu+59WMbUg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycsErXAonRnzUHtI5iw2KecFbJYRpG/dMBENJi72vTcq0wCaxYB5eHndr3boD6O7aaPX9hDA==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b04c:: with SMTP id d12mr9157358ljl.398.1590317680660; Sun, 24 May 2020 03:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-235-192-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.235.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p23sm3145361ljh.117.2020.05.24.03.54.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 May 2020 03:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3d24de48-1475-152d-4a38-a06e584d75d8@gmx.at>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 13:54:38 +0300
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0A8DFF3A-00B2-48C0-A75C-3BA4A219B1FE@gmail.com>
References: <BE44EAE9-5CFB-4F5D-85B8-05AFA516C151@akamai.com> <CACL_3VEbUHB-Omwp1-g5Tq3G3J-kKj9N3jPZLcfruicw3X=AsA@mail.gmail.com> <2CBBD8CD-2088-4E41-B113-EED665853D3C@akamai.com> <CAM4esxSFCBcxXjz5JJJg1z6+wwfN3mTrtJ8bKiBsj2TeOmmFSw@mail.gmail.com> <93331803-e7db-95dc-a4ae-052c347c3c86@bobbriscoe.net> <MN2PR19MB4045568B4A794F1DCE6974BB83B90@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <3d24de48-1475-152d-4a38-a06e584d75d8@gmx.at>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs.ietf@gmx.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/8mW_7E0Q9yJJ8qEsl7GcLfDyxCc>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 10:54:45 -0000

> On 24 May, 2020, at 9:50 am, Scheffenegger, Richard <rs.ietf@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> Maybe I missed this, but under the SCE scheme, I was assuming the 1/p
> signal was ECT(1), not ECT(0). Or have we all agreed already, that
> ECT(1) is the "new" network input signal (both SCE and L4S), but an AQM
> may re-mark it into ECT(0) or CE?
> 
> I bring this up because I apparently missed the context around "and uses
> ECT(0) [remarked from ECT(1)]".

Jake's proposal reverses the sense of ECT(0) and ECT(1) relative to SCE.  His aim is to give the backwards compatibility of SCE whilst retaining the identifying power of setting ECT(1) at origin.  You may wish to re-read older posts from him to get more detail.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email