IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Sat, 09 May 2020 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621083A0938 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2020 02:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjel0NmHi4n9 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2020 02:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x129.google.com (mail-lf1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2543A0937 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2020 02:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x129.google.com with SMTP id b26so3354345lfa.5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 May 2020 02:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yuUE53uZsTyF5tOhSK5mGlIyUiB7qQzehKpbNqoxzpo=; b=EuNt5put4QfAHHQHRA+/iwvy9cWHMFdgidSZOlhrWR1ibIuMPj9hC4QT7TjzVvsvNT PvbEjdaAv4st28Hhwy2z2IbwOF+t+v7ZMuV9BNPFQM876dDb9IXNPJXfB9L3YeQNwmtu lWrFfp1h2SmNHvbCngwKKRIikcbPDQUKTBgU18Ecz76kdUbBiiLXYPsa7VU8uUkYxEOF lLpCD6eKhCqLXcwTM4gcVjyHVPpBYayh9Da3DZB9PCvtRSX/svVyyXfctIf174e/l7Sv SVRejOKw63fE0Q04wWigmka2ZDCRZoneQRxOvqi4chga3wW7NyLXA7kAv2uArb3Ycdzk JDQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yuUE53uZsTyF5tOhSK5mGlIyUiB7qQzehKpbNqoxzpo=; b=TiP9i9wDuGGvMK47JHtSKazR5DQSW9TFTUEiCd7YrKFy/+B5I6DI5yBMvXO/8kymm+ GdXsu5DLLEsjkT+E+WF+Y6Ywjqg87ZSgUdHyls48oTbUmGUOiSmJJLqim0rIzxJvSXg7 qSl3s5/u4E/QQH0m2wUON+xEJfUl2pE9xI6jWQaPDN8xswUcDWlpKNvng4xJDpZdoOVl twRVa+iibc8aXVOcegG8xQKvYcpgAi1bHoWS7q9tlvv65WgVUm+EfhR+QL5De+1eZt4X AMZsefTY8sYuID2N+C7TCbB5R7nAWTzxkCCqx4If/YM9sftmv9plAPeFRU6GdjOPHRb3 tvew==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ND1bD3fqJs3sRDhNTGWjhPItvVl3rFkkeQNWxFNNjlRsCs7Jt he3jpFv2KYaOMMFkdn5pTwfK51M6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+YpGqZqOPdSyW8gTt6lg67dYO+IRF0DaQJt02WjSXPFrCur6N9+M6mxRR2zx5PEzOGl/TPA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:108f:: with SMTP id j15mr4618228lfg.19.1589015946576; Sat, 09 May 2020 02:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-235-192-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.235.192]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g11sm3250125ljg.24.2020.05.09.02.19.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 May 2020 02:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <567224268.28656.1588987468089@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 12:19:04 +0300
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F14323B6-FB4F-4A32-9911-B2357A796BAF@gmail.com>
References: <BE44EAE9-5CFB-4F5D-85B8-05AFA516C151@akamai.com> <1523713490.286122.1588978733887@mail.yahoo.com> <DF860A44-5474-4258-BE8F-CEDECCC08114@akamai.com> <567224268.28656.1588987468089@mail.yahoo.com>
To: "alex.burr@ealdwulf.org.uk" <alex.burr@ealdwulf.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/rcThfUMYugLCi4RS8e9YxRF1UBs>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 09:19:11 -0000

> On 9 May, 2020, at 4:24 am, alex.burr@ealdwulf.org.uk wrote:
> 
> [AB] Not exactly. The existing L4S scheme mark congestion with an ECT(1) to CE transition. In the scheme C in my previous mail, an L4S AQM would be defined to  mark it instead with the opposite, a CE to ECT(1) transition, while the RFC3168 AQM continues to mark using the ECT(1) to CE transition..

I don't think this idea is workable.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email