IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Sun, 24 May 2020 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A133A03EA for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 06:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MGvCRsBerN9r for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 May 2020 06:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F8D3A02BE for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 06:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A1F64BEA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:18:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0E1VB/dFubrkU8IdEXZjnwhM6pY=; b=KM33YC N+jge4guqrtkj/9X/VLfE3CwheOTtva0dLWeuOU8AfV37rbUdCYwdJ8PeOrsu9Oo vg0Wefj4wqgaGo5lXsILMTIXPGxYEOIHRgSDJvP1dBJ7YxK8x8UnvdfljIumod0t oxquY/XDinfRkN0FXf94zFXXrZjF/n9UQTAOo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=IiUHqjsEBkj8bMkJT4prMewkwYKIgRQS XmswOXg53btXdzT59F1gSxL+mRrPWz/SLOQMyeHK7hle2jiDAz4t3Xp1IVIvSZFl 0wKaEIyiI1E5M07g8gnozOSG9qiH2cxL8LGOu0qI6m4trzHAO16p4Zt2cHkjrBxZ a//PRLoaFw4=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6F464BE9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:18:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-il1-f173.google.com (unknown [209.85.166.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C02F64BE8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 09:18:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-il1-f173.google.com with SMTP id a14so15199645ilk.2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 May 2020 06:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bVIegzxjQdt1XPxKhHDY3320scPCVfs64ykRNEsv+Uwl3dvx6 KWxvvJdSskr/EhxdITcy40cPaigcW4EpSZODpGY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/3UZ5lEjG1F2EWEzrcgyKTmBjLZYVJUVLI367x1s9mygQs7NjD+zyr5VWyXMeFTTbusoQ70oIpeGG/2aMdR8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1292:: with SMTP id y18mr20241221ilq.143.1590326288754; Sun, 24 May 2020 06:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BE44EAE9-5CFB-4F5D-85B8-05AFA516C151@akamai.com> <CACL_3VEbUHB-Omwp1-g5Tq3G3J-kKj9N3jPZLcfruicw3X=AsA@mail.gmail.com> <2CBBD8CD-2088-4E41-B113-EED665853D3C@akamai.com> <CAM4esxSFCBcxXjz5JJJg1z6+wwfN3mTrtJ8bKiBsj2TeOmmFSw@mail.gmail.com> <93331803-e7db-95dc-a4ae-052c347c3c86@bobbriscoe.net> <MN2PR19MB4045568B4A794F1DCE6974BB83B90@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <42234fd1-6ee8-cbcc-408c-1ea2b2554f2b@bobbriscoe.net> <9539CFBB-5F07-4104-B30D-BFE323F20352@akamai.com> <CACL_3VG3xwP=XLdzpdH2BMiFgb7a4aBNnp-SWkMSm+0=GbibXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VG3xwP=XLdzpdH2BMiFgb7a4aBNnp-SWkMSm+0=GbibXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 06:17:57 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VHMZnvyypKrXBOZXhji_V9OMfsQFhQO-eGvMOzjJEz=1w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VHMZnvyypKrXBOZXhji_V9OMfsQFhQO-eGvMOzjJEz=1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000084adab05a664b154"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 030706AE-9DC1-11EA-9B8D-C28CBED8090B-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/dzD8DKwrIYWkhb6wkm7TAgt0W5I>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Update to Position Statement on ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 13:18:16 -0000

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:06 PM C. M. Heard wrote:
> RFC 6040 adopted the rule that ECT(1) overrides ECT(1) at tunnel egress

That should have said " ECT(1) overrides ECT(0) at tunnel egress"

Mike Heard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email