Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009

Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com> Mon, 26 October 2009 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC0A3A69A0 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ImiIZJBBDmJL for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3263A6996 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,627,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="52810501"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2009 18:21:38 +0000
Received: from ams-flefauch-8716.cisco.com (ams-flefauch-8716.cisco.com [10.55.161.199]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9QILbIM016946; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:21:37 GMT
References: <4ACDED48.8030901@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4ACDED48.8030901@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Message-Id: <823CC247-BA7F-49E5-8334-AC6D00A2A809@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:21:33 +0100
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Cc: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, tsvwg chair <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:21:27 -0000

Hello Gorry,

Could you comment on draft-ietf-rsvp-l3vpn?

The TSWG charter page (http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/tsvwg-charter.html 
) says:
"Done	  	Request publication of 'Support for RSVP in Layer 3 VPNs' as  
Proposed Standard RFC"

However, the I-D Tracker had a state of "New Version Needed". I  
believe this is because with had a few comments from the IESG review.  
So I posted a new version addressing those comments.

Should the document now be resubmitted to IESG?

Thanks

Francois


On 8 Oct 2009, at 15:46, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

>
> I've summarised the list of drafts I know about in TSVWG and their  
> current state. Please do take time to read this. If there are  
> omissions or corrections, do let me know and I'll fix them.
>
> - If you are an author please do update your document before the  
> deadline for the next IETF (not so many weeks from now!!) I see one  
> document is even expired with pending comments!
>
> - If you have comments on these drafts, please let us know. If we  
> are going to things completed by the milestones, we'll need people  
> to comment on the documents and new revisions to be published.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Gorry & James
> (as TSVWG Chairs)
>
> ======== TSVWG STATUS 8th OCT 2009 ========
>
> ================ IESG Processing ================
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches-07 (as INFO)
>
> Notes: None.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-09 (as PS)
>
> Notes: None.
>
> ================ WG Chair ACTION NEEDED ================
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-12 (as PS)
>
> Status:  In WGLC (Shepherd = Gorry Fairhurst)
> ACTION: WG Review reports, and notes of usefulness are needed.
> Notes: {WGLCTo end: 17th October 2009}
> 8th Oct - currently no nodes of support or comments.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-04 (as BCP)
> Milestone: Nov 2009
> - Submit 'Port Randomization for Transport Protocols' to the IESG
>
> Status: This ID is past WGLC. (Shepherd = James Polk)
> ACTION: JP to close the LC discussions and provide write-up.
> Notes: WGLC concluded April 15th
> New revision posted 3rd July - awaiting response by James Polk.=
>
> ================ With WG ================
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-admitted-realtime-dscp-05 (as PS)
>
> Status: This ID is past WGLC. (Shepherd = Magnus Westerlund)
> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors.
> Notes: JP to make final edits (based on Magnus' AD comments)
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-00 (as PS)
>
> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05 (as INFO)
> Milestone: Nov 2009
> - Submit 'Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP Security' to IESG
>
> ACTION: Reviews Needed to say ready for WGLC
> Notes: Francois believes this is ready for WGLC.
> Ran Adkinson no longer has any objection to this.
> JP will shepherd.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-02 (as BCP)
> Milestone:  Dec 2009
> -'IANA Procedures for the Transport Protocol Port Number Space'
>
> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors.
> Notes:  GF will shepherd.
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-19 (as INFO)
> Milestone: Dec 2009
> - 'Sockets API Extensions for SCTP' to IESG
>
> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors.
> Notes: Lacks a good IANA section, and  security consideration.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-03 (as PS)
> Milestone: Jan 2010
> - 'Layered Encapsulation of Congestion Notification'
>
> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors (WG Comments welcome)
> Notes: Substantial review of previous version.
> GF and David Black to confirm if issues raised were answered.
> New material needs review.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-for-sctp-01 (as PS)
> Milestone: Dec 2009
> - 'DTLS for SCTP'
>
> ACTION: Reviewers needed.
> Notes: Reviews needed to allow this to progress to LC.
> Authors think this is about ready for WGLC.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest (as INFO)
> Milestone:  Feb 2010
> - Request publication of 'Byte and Packet Congestion Notification'
>
> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors (WG Comments welcome)
> Notes: Comments received on rev 00, but no new revision.
> Current version has expired Feb 2009.
> Chairs need to know if author wishes to continue with a revised ID.
>
> ================ Individual Drafts ================
>
> These drafts are ones that are being tracked, if you have a draft that
> you think is ready for WG comments please email the Chairs.
>
> --------------------------------------------
> * draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps-02
>
> Notes:
> 	AD help requested to know what with encapsulation drafts.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-fairhurst-6man-tsvwg-udptt-02	
> - The UDP Tunnel Transport mode
> Status: Individual Submission
>
> Notes:
> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG and 6MAN.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02.txt
> Status: Individual Submission
>
> Notes:
> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing
> Status: Individual Submission
>
> Notes:
> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-lefaucheur-tsvwg-rsvp-multiple-preemption
> Status: Individual Submission
>
> Notes:
> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing
> Status: Individual Submission
>
> Notes:
> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-adams-tsvwg-flow-signaling-identification-00
> -  Flow State Aware signalling standardisation, and a proposal for
> alerting nodes or end-systems on data related to a flow
> Status: Individual Submission,  Not discussed by this group.
>
> Notes: None.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> * draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-6man-udpzero-00
> - IPv6 UDP Checksum Considerations
> Status: Individual Submission,  Not discussed by this group.
>
> Notes:
> Linked to work in 6MAN, MBONED and LISP
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>