Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009
Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com> Thu, 05 November 2009 18:55 UTC
Return-Path: <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B523828C0F3 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:55:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.435
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.164, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOWBQ9lR-xxL for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC49B3A68ED for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:55:20 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,687,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="53741520"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2009 18:55:40 +0000
Received: from [144.254.53.136] ([144.254.53.136]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA5ItdFu003965; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:55:39 GMT
References: <4ACDED48.8030901@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <51865E1A72F61D48A247348DCCBA5CFB5A8B1E@XMB-AMS-105.cisco.com> <11A12A19-3F02-453C-9104-9BA96D5ED2C1@cisco.com> <32CF1043-84E3-4EA9-B836-8F03657CA25A@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <32CF1043-84E3-4EA9-B836-8F03657CA25A@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Message-Id: <BD962917-8B5B-434F-A5CF-624C2C25CDDB@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:55:39 +0100
To: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "James (jmpolk) Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:55:22 -0000
Hello Gorry, James, Any comments on why this document is not going for Last Call as (apparently) agreed 4 months ago? Francois On 26 Oct 2009, at 19:14, Francois Le Faucheur wrote: > Gorry, James, > > Any comments on why this document is not going for Last Call as > (apparently) agreed 3.5 months ago? > > Thanks > > Francois > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 15:04, Francois Le Faucheur wrote: > >> Gorry, James, >> >> Independently of getting the Status Report corrected, my >> understanding is that draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying >> has been declared ready to go to WGLC 3 months ago as per the >> Stockholm meeting minutes. Could you please: >> (i) either issue the Last Call >> (ii) or let us know if there are outstanding thing sin the way. >> >> Thanks >> >> Francois >> >> On 16 Oct 2009, at 14:43, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: >> >>> Gorry, >>> >>> Regarding >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05 (as INFO) >>> Milestone: Nov 2009 >>> - Submit 'Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP Security' to IESG >>> >>> ACTION: Reviews Needed to say ready for WGLC >>> Notes: Francois believes this is ready for WGLC. >>> Ran Adkinson no longer has any objection to this. >>> JP will shepherd. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I believe this status not to be correct. Please refer to >>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tsvwg/minutes?item=minutes75.html >>> >>> " The WG will now take this to LC. People who have >>> commented prior to WGLC >>> please quickly re-read and confirm this is ready for >>> publication. >>> " >>> >>> My understanding from the last meeting was that: >>> - the chairs would issue a WGLC (quite explicitly in the notes) >>> - people who have commented before to quickly confirm that their >>> concerns >>> have been addressed. >>> >>> Please also refer to my mail to the list from 8 Sep >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/current/msg09448.html >>> Where I asked whether there are any open issues, and I was not >>> told about any. >>> >>> So in my understanding the document should be in the section >>> ================ WG Chair ACTION NEEDED ================ >>> >>> Could you please confirm this or correct my statements above? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Gorry Fairhurst >>> Sent: Thu 08-Oct-09 15:46 >>> To: tsvwg WG >>> Cc: tsvwg chair >>> Subject: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 >>> >>> >>> I've summarised the list of drafts I know about in TSVWG and their >>> current state. Please do take time to read this. If there are >>> omissions >>> or corrections, do let me know and I'll fix them. >>> >>> - If you are an author please do update your document before the >>> deadline for the next IETF (not so many weeks from now!!) I see one >>> document is even expired with pending comments! >>> >>> - If you have comments on these drafts, please let us know. If we >>> are >>> going to things completed by the milestones, we'll need people to >>> comment on the documents and new revisions to be published. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Gorry & James >>> (as TSVWG Chairs) >>> >>> ======== TSVWG STATUS 8th OCT 2009 ======== >>> >>> ================ IESG Processing ================ >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches-07 (as INFO) >>> >>> Notes: None. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-09 (as PS) >>> >>> Notes: None. >>> >>> ================ WG Chair ACTION NEEDED ================ >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-12 (as PS) >>> >>> Status: In WGLC (Shepherd = Gorry Fairhurst) >>> ACTION: WG Review reports, and notes of usefulness are needed. >>> Notes: {WGLCTo end: 17th October 2009} >>> 8th Oct - currently no nodes of support or comments. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-04 (as BCP) >>> Milestone: Nov 2009 >>> - Submit 'Port Randomization for Transport Protocols' to the IESG >>> >>> Status: This ID is past WGLC. (Shepherd = James Polk) >>> ACTION: JP to close the LC discussions and provide write-up. >>> Notes: WGLC concluded April 15th >>> New revision posted 3rd July - awaiting response by James Polk.= >>> >>> ================ With WG ================ >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-admitted-realtime-dscp-05 (as PS) >>> >>> Status: This ID is past WGLC. (Shepherd = Magnus Westerlund) >>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>> Notes: JP to make final edits (based on Magnus' AD comments) >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-00 (as PS) >>> >>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05 (as INFO) >>> Milestone: Nov 2009 >>> - Submit 'Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP Security' to IESG >>> >>> ACTION: Reviews Needed to say ready for WGLC >>> Notes: Francois believes this is ready for WGLC. >>> Ran Adkinson no longer has any objection to this. >>> JP will shepherd. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-02 (as BCP) >>> Milestone: Dec 2009 >>> -'IANA Procedures for the Transport Protocol Port Number Space' >>> >>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>> Notes: GF will shepherd. >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-19 (as INFO) >>> Milestone: Dec 2009 >>> - 'Sockets API Extensions for SCTP' to IESG >>> >>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>> Notes: Lacks a good IANA section, and security consideration. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-03 (as PS) >>> Milestone: Jan 2010 >>> - 'Layered Encapsulation of Congestion Notification' >>> >>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors (WG Comments welcome) >>> Notes: Substantial review of previous version. >>> GF and David Black to confirm if issues raised were answered. >>> New material needs review. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-for-sctp-01 (as PS) >>> Milestone: Dec 2009 >>> - 'DTLS for SCTP' >>> >>> ACTION: Reviewers needed. >>> Notes: Reviews needed to allow this to progress to LC. >>> Authors think this is about ready for WGLC. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest (as INFO) >>> Milestone: Feb 2010 >>> - Request publication of 'Byte and Packet Congestion Notification' >>> >>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors (WG Comments welcome) >>> Notes: Comments received on rev 00, but no new revision. >>> Current version has expired Feb 2009. >>> Chairs need to know if author wishes to continue with a revised ID. >>> >>> ================ Individual Drafts ================ >>> >>> These drafts are ones that are being tracked, if you have a draft >>> that >>> you think is ready for WG comments please email the Chairs. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> * draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps-02 >>> >>> Notes: >>> AD help requested to know what with encapsulation drafts. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-fairhurst-6man-tsvwg-udptt-02 >>> - The UDP Tunnel Transport mode >>> Status: Individual Submission >>> >>> Notes: >>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG and 6MAN. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02.txt >>> Status: Individual Submission >>> >>> Notes: >>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing >>> Status: Individual Submission >>> >>> Notes: >>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-lefaucheur-tsvwg-rsvp-multiple-preemption >>> Status: Individual Submission >>> >>> Notes: >>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing >>> Status: Individual Submission >>> >>> Notes: >>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-adams-tsvwg-flow-signaling-identification-00 >>> - Flow State Aware signalling standardisation, and a proposal for >>> alerting nodes or end-systems on data related to a flow >>> Status: Individual Submission, Not discussed by this group. >>> >>> Notes: None. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-6man-udpzero-00 >>> - IPv6 UDP Checksum Considerations >>> Status: Individual Submission, Not discussed by this group. >>> >>> Notes: >>> Linked to work in 6MAN, MBONED and LISP >>> >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Michael Behringer (mbehring)
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 James M. Polk
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 ken carlberg
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Brian Weis
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur