Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009
Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Thu, 05 November 2009 20:43 UTC
Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9342F3A690D for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:43:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id diRQARMe8a83 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4477B3A68C8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,687,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="266925265"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2009 20:44:20 +0000
Received: from dhcp-128-107-163-159.cisco.com (dhcp-128-107-163-159.cisco.com [128.107.163.159]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA5KiKir014636; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:44:20 GMT
Message-Id: <A4FC9937-4E8F-4F56-A1DE-05F2EB8D925D@cisco.com>
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <13280819-8B1A-4C41-BECB-16DDB82FA9AC@g11.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:44:15 -0800
References: <4ACDED48.8030901@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <51865E1A72F61D48A247348DCCBA5CFB5A8B1E@XMB-AMS-105.cisco.com> <11A12A19-3F02-453C-9104-9BA96D5ED2C1@cisco.com> <32CF1043-84E3-4EA9-B836-8F03657CA25A@cisco.com> <BD962917-8B5B-434F-A5CF-624C2C25CDDB@cisco.com> <XFE-SJC-2127fcGuKed00004c36@xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com> <13280819-8B1A-4C41-BECB-16DDB82FA9AC@g11.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:43:58 -0000
I also reviewed it in June, had questions, and was satisfied with the responses (last message sent to the list 6/4/09). I believe it's ready for WGLC. Brian On Nov 5, 2009, at 11:50 AM, ken carlberg wrote: > I reviewed the document back in June, and was satisfied with the > exchange and changes made to the last draft. I had actually assumed > it was ready for WGLC a while back. So if you are in need of a > voice to say, "go ahead"....well, go ahead :-) > > -ken > > > On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:39 PM, James M. Polk wrote: > >> Francois >> >> This is directly from the meeting minutes: >> >> "The WG will now take this to LC. People who have commented prior to >> WGLC please quickly re-read and confirm this is ready for >> publication." >> >> Which is close - but not exactly how I remember things. I remember >> asking the room for folks to ping the list and say whether this ID >> ready for WGLC. No one on the list has commented since Stockholm >> about this ID (up or down) -- so we chairs have hesitated issuing >> the WGLC. >> >> Perhaps I should have pushed the WG more directly to the list. I >> apologize for that. >> >> James >> >> At 12:55 PM 11/5/2009, Francois Le Faucheur wrote: >>> Hello Gorry, James, >>> >>> Any comments on why this document is not going for Last Call as >>> (apparently) agreed 4 months ago? >>> >>> Francois >>> >>> On 26 Oct 2009, at 19:14, Francois Le Faucheur wrote: >>> >>>> Gorry, James, >>>> >>>> Any comments on why this document is not going for Last Call as >>>> (apparently) agreed 3.5 months ago? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Francois >>>> >>>> On 16 Oct 2009, at 15:04, Francois Le Faucheur wrote: >>>> >>>>> Gorry, James, >>>>> >>>>> Independently of getting the Status Report corrected, my >>>>> understanding is that draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying >>>>> has been declared ready to go to WGLC 3 months ago as per the >>>>> Stockholm meeting minutes. Could you please: >>>>> (i) either issue the Last Call >>>>> (ii) or let us know if there are outstanding thing sin the >>>>> way. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Francois >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Oct 2009, at 14:43, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Gorry, >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05 (as INFO) >>>>>> Milestone: Nov 2009 >>>>>> - Submit 'Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP Security' to >>>>>> IESG >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Reviews Needed to say ready for WGLC >>>>>> Notes: Francois believes this is ready for WGLC. >>>>>> Ran Adkinson no longer has any objection to this. >>>>>> JP will shepherd. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe this status not to be correct. Please refer to >>>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tsvwg/minutes?item=minutes75.html >>>>>> >>>>>> " The WG will now take this to LC. People who have >>>>>> commented prior to WGLC >>>>>> please quickly re-read and confirm this is ready for >>>>>> publication. >>>>>> " >>>>>> >>>>>> My understanding from the last meeting was that: >>>>>> - the chairs would issue a WGLC (quite explicitly in the notes) >>>>>> - people who have commented before to quickly confirm that their >>>>>> concerns >>>>>> have been addressed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please also refer to my mail to the list from 8 Sep >>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/current/msg09448.html >>>>>> Where I asked whether there are any open issues, and I was not >>>>>> told about any. >>>>>> >>>>>> So in my understanding the document should be in the section >>>>>> ================ WG Chair ACTION NEEDED ================ >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you please confirm this or correct my statements above? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Gorry Fairhurst >>>>>> Sent: Thu 08-Oct-09 15:46 >>>>>> To: tsvwg WG >>>>>> Cc: tsvwg chair >>>>>> Subject: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've summarised the list of drafts I know about in TSVWG and >>>>>> their >>>>>> current state. Please do take time to read this. If there are >>>>>> omissions >>>>>> or corrections, do let me know and I'll fix them. >>>>>> >>>>>> - If you are an author please do update your document before the >>>>>> deadline for the next IETF (not so many weeks from now!!) I see >>>>>> one >>>>>> document is even expired with pending comments! >>>>>> >>>>>> - If you have comments on these drafts, please let us know. If we >>>>>> are >>>>>> going to things completed by the milestones, we'll need people to >>>>>> comment on the documents and new revisions to be published. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gorry & James >>>>>> (as TSVWG Chairs) >>>>>> >>>>>> ======== TSVWG STATUS 8th OCT 2009 ======== >>>>>> >>>>>> ================ IESG Processing ================ >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-approaches-07 (as INFO) >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: None. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-proxy-proto-09 (as PS) >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: None. >>>>>> >>>>>> ================ WG Chair ACTION NEEDED ================ >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-emergency-rsvp-12 (as PS) >>>>>> >>>>>> Status: In WGLC (Shepherd = Gorry Fairhurst) >>>>>> ACTION: WG Review reports, and notes of usefulness are needed. >>>>>> Notes: {WGLCTo end: 17th October 2009} >>>>>> 8th Oct - currently no nodes of support or comments. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-04 (as BCP) >>>>>> Milestone: Nov 2009 >>>>>> - Submit 'Port Randomization for Transport Protocols' to the IESG >>>>>> >>>>>> Status: This ID is past WGLC. (Shepherd = James Polk) >>>>>> ACTION: JP to close the LC discussions and provide write-up. >>>>>> Notes: WGLC concluded April 15th >>>>>> New revision posted 3rd July - awaiting response by James Polk.= >>>>>> >>>>>> ================ With WG ================ >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-admitted-realtime-dscp-05 (as PS) >>>>>> >>>>>> Status: This ID is past WGLC. (Shepherd = Magnus Westerlund) >>>>>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>>>>> Notes: JP to make final edits (based on Magnus' AD comments) >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-00 (as PS) >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying-05 (as INFO) >>>>>> Milestone: Nov 2009 >>>>>> - Submit 'Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP Security' to >>>>>> IESG >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Reviews Needed to say ready for WGLC >>>>>> Notes: Francois believes this is ready for WGLC. >>>>>> Ran Adkinson no longer has any objection to this. >>>>>> JP will shepherd. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-02 (as BCP) >>>>>> Milestone: Dec 2009 >>>>>> -'IANA Procedures for the Transport Protocol Port Number Space' >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>>>>> Notes: GF will shepherd. >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket-19 (as INFO) >>>>>> Milestone: Dec 2009 >>>>>> - 'Sockets API Extensions for SCTP' to IESG >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors. >>>>>> Notes: Lacks a good IANA section, and security consideration. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-tunnel-03 (as PS) >>>>>> Milestone: Jan 2010 >>>>>> - 'Layered Encapsulation of Congestion Notification' >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors (WG Comments welcome) >>>>>> Notes: Substantial review of previous version. >>>>>> GF and David Black to confirm if issues raised were answered. >>>>>> New material needs review. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-for-sctp-01 (as PS) >>>>>> Milestone: Dec 2009 >>>>>> - 'DTLS for SCTP' >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Reviewers needed. >>>>>> Notes: Reviews needed to allow this to progress to LC. >>>>>> Authors think this is about ready for WGLC. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest (as INFO) >>>>>> Milestone: Feb 2010 >>>>>> - Request publication of 'Byte and Packet Congestion >>>>>> Notification' >>>>>> >>>>>> ACTION: Awaiting new revision by authors (WG Comments welcome) >>>>>> Notes: Comments received on rev 00, but no new revision. >>>>>> Current version has expired Feb 2009. >>>>>> Chairs need to know if author wishes to continue with a revised >>>>>> ID. >>>>>> >>>>>> ================ Individual Drafts ================ >>>>>> >>>>>> These drafts are ones that are being tracked, if you have a draft >>>>>> that >>>>>> you think is ready for WG comments please email the Chairs. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> * draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps-02 >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> AD help requested to know what with encapsulation drafts. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-fairhurst-6man-tsvwg-udptt-02 >>>>>> - The UDP Tunnel Transport mode >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG and 6MAN. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02.txt >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-lefaucheur-tsvwg-rsvp-multiple-preemption >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> Presented at IETF-75 (Stockholm) to TSVWG >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-adams-tsvwg-flow-signaling-identification-00 >>>>>> - Flow State Aware signalling standardisation, and a proposal >>>>>> for >>>>>> alerting nodes or end-systems on data related to a flow >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission, Not discussed by this group. >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: None. >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> * draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-6man-udpzero-00 >>>>>> - IPv6 UDP Checksum Considerations >>>>>> Status: Individual Submission, Not discussed by this group. >>>>>> >>>>>> Notes: >>>>>> Linked to work in 6MAN, MBONED and LISP >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > -- Brian Weis Router/Switch Security Group, ARTG, Cisco Systems Telephone: +1 408 526 4796 Email: bew@cisco.com
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Michael Behringer (mbehring)
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 James M. Polk
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 ken carlberg
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Brian Weis
- Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG Status Report Oct 2009 Francois Le Faucheur