Re: [tsvwg] [saag] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Wed, 06 November 2019 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861B9120835; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:11:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osI2B5UgLGiJ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:11:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz (mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54B4120829; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:11:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1573035095; x=1604571095; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+sQXlU9sg8AwhUefQMqAGRaapk7UG4EzQHi5oVNGOgc=; b=N1ab8kwoG+LY37atgq8R3QksUEjDfJxi3fiYD1qya1HtW8XLlVXfe+hg HiAEoJbIOW0z+FYv6Dinx45VRmtBWKnqpmOchfWSaF5YzltYzwkAQPac1 aQIJY1uAcNXTTvj90H/UMcq+Niyxg3YLyfMbvrk0LRl2O1EcOZQn9WFX/ KLAoya9usLmYh9A98lmAYJDM5avL6v1FMC63ETCOoXLhi58ukCQ+sztPo pS4fPbvzrf2YMYwiB9TAW8BTeVck+52XSJQHNgroXgsfEAK6ibPeh3Xmq FMf4RHlsDR6iUlezPHFViJmgpkvaEU+96vV5M6FQj7y+CRvFPDwxbd1h5 A==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,274,1569240000"; d="scan'208";a="98362132"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 10.6.3.4 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from uxcn13-tdc-c.uoa.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.3.4]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 06 Nov 2019 23:11:32 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.2.5) by uxcn13-tdc-c.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.3.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:11:32 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.5]) by uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.5]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 23:11:32 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
CC: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [saag] [tsvwg] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
Thread-Index: AQHVkyCjrwMtocCjZ0izavTli3wJVKd6WcIAgAAVngCAAARbAIABsv2AgAAFtwCAAARPgIAACCuAgAASewCAAaJ3cA==
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:11:31 +0000
Message-ID: <1573035094775.62307@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <67CE4313-A4C2-4CC7-972E-CB465D47B7FE@ericsson.com> <998B7C3E-54D8-40AC-BF91-901390CF70C5@strayalpha.com>, <CAPDSy+5rvaXgEGZ7_V4pRdmBss7Hf1XmaGbiXGZceQu9hjjRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+5rvaXgEGZ7_V4pRdmBss7Hf1XmaGbiXGZceQu9hjjRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/FKts_9GeiBk7iVnG-I1ffb6-Tnw>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [saag] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 10:11:38 -0000

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> writes:

>I also oppose publication of draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt. This
>document discourages transport header encryption and publishing it could harm
>future protocol development.

More than any other comment, this one seems to sum up the real opposition to
publication of this document:

  This document conflicts with my political agenda, so it cannot be allowed to
  be published.

It's a well-written discussion of issues that need to be taken into account
when considering header encryption.  Taking the "lalalalala-I'm-not-listening-
lalalala" approach won't make these issues go away, it just means that they'll
come and bite implementers and deployers of header-encryption protocols
because the document that would have discussed them in order to allow them to
be addressed at the design stage before they became a problem was suppressed.

May I instead rephrase the above objection slightly to:

  I also support publication of draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt.  This
  document points out real issues that need to be taken into consideration
  when encrypting headers, and not publishing it will harm future protocol
  development.

Peter.