IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.txt

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Fri, 19 February 2021 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8D43A0983 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:36:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.433
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.433 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CkMLh4xOVNHB for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:36:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk (mail-ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk [185.185.84.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B001A3A097E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 13:36:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VELcANn/BciszGO2LSO16BjNOzeMJucgNXKsiGK+Hjw=; b=QrKRNJfKoSYf1B1KVANR0fLG48 LRDlJF5lz0hzuk+CdnpmNVu2j7KOVMckoQH95WO/OlFf16lO739EWW5zvKdpQGOjtUcBnTgQuYEvD SDoi1LxJYvtYL6EehKl2VL6X1a9uCNLHB3VUGFo7Chhut/YESKIAHw6hP9Oxak1OoqjVFSPTWravt Ke9pGy50Fd5fWeCbefvqQcN4oXNsZPaJCaw97jOgDVv5zfphE5l4W15sDKwKVfaKQvWmqZzmK8hsB iKKet+0PWjUKzTmugTpQkpBm5W/u1x1lKJ7n9vHBW3L2wm7W8qcT5YOW7NBPRgXPhz7izNKv797x2 LCADOkew==;
Received: from 67.153.238.178.in-addr.arpa ([178.238.153.67]:39544 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1lDDS2-0000ov-Aw; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:36:38 +0000
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <161366419040.16138.17111583810851995947@ietfa.amsl.com> <BF0810D9-E742-4FCB-90B1-6957551B585D@heistp.net> <b222bbdf-70ae-3e5b-b122-1160299fb4e2@bobbriscoe.net> <E7CC88FA-F064-4B72-BAA9-8BE40F7AF040@gmail.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <a952bc70-859e-22b2-68b3-a607cd02831e@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:36:36 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E7CC88FA-F064-4B72-BAA9-8BE40F7AF040@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/XnywePMQiK0JJAKKRVy8sLN_E4k>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:36:41 -0000

Jonathan,

On 19/02/2021 13:34, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> On 19 Feb, 2021, at 2:50 pm, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
>>
>> Given you have close contact with this ISP, have you asked, or could you ask them whether they have ever deployed any FIFO ECN-enabled AQMs themselves?
> As far as I'm aware, they have only used fq_codel for ECN.  Before that, they were using SFQ in some places, without any AQM.

[BB] So do you suspect that any of the CE-marking in traffic not 
traversing their backhaul FQ-CoDel boxes is from a FIFO ECN-enabled AQM?

Or is this ISP particularly attractive to users into free and 
open-source software, in which case I would have thought the CE marking 
is most likely to be coming from FQ-CoDel? Or can we just not really tell?

As the rest of your email changed subject to tunnels, I've split that 
into a separate thread.


Bob

>
>   - Jonathan Morton

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email