Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
"Ozer, Sebnem" <Sebnem_Ozer@comcast.com> Fri, 08 May 2020 21:54 UTC
Return-Path: <Sebnem_Ozer@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EF53A0F93 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.com header.b=w81K8Eyd; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.com header.b=BDBUfiCZ; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=comcastcorp.onmicrosoft.com header.b=WOUPOv4o
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDcAeQWUG4Jm for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00143702.pphosted.com (mx0b-00143702.pphosted.com [148.163.141.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 537E53A1068 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 14:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0156894.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00143702.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 048LnEJo029383 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 17:54:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=20190412; bh=mRrY6LjzaNWePgEMB59cjZq4tIkEGnIfmJfnZDh12YM=; b=w81K8Eyd8zhwYwSTVRBPTZlA41KCO+D0AGptxneNOe4LQclwknI6Y7bgxe3uk6x2TcHM fySSwNR/1q5lqQrTOUo/SdcHbX7FC55p6G9CkJy4Rnemrhshfe5Zw7KuCqIGYp45YSZB AJyyTdmZTURmV8Rc9y1dcfO6cIc/WpjPkL0ZQxrRQUawwHr00hR+QCwPNK2F/ZdJW9GV G4Sptrltd60i+c+ED2MVHOE9cvRIfY4JwRNBKQ90Q5rostA8xvUwI2d+ZgIP4oTA0zFf Bg6cHum9ZoDOUwDDerCsAHIwttIHQ+JmFruxoTg7/5n7/acR5AtVfLYvWuKpr8soi87s gw==
Received: from pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (PACDCMHOUT01.cable.comcast.com [68.87.31.167]) by mx0b-00143702.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30vtespdsa-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2020 17:54:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=comcast.com; s=20190412; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@comcast.com; t=1588974850; x=2452888450; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mRrY6LjzaNWePgEMB59cjZq4tIkEGnIfmJfnZDh12YM=; b=BDBUfiCZuI92dkiNIaKAOG1KgDpJfHftfBrf0u3cxEuaBfu4i1l3IVwu32r0DoaN 2H5ssnf64kB8FCyJ2ILnV0uFzwOcZPMSQkLH8NA2W4YiY5qpeKqR1VTCh+OYvi3Y EvaIcYbwqrr5KpUbSP2pyHg42rRJA7vhcspRLWVv1+ZeesYoP61Ih7oHSde9NZME 1ltnyvM6n/Wvf6hUHu05XMfq5AoccsQYWEMZxVfh/smuUMp5Sb5PDS6JVl8rgvag SP+bgWrkUmIkZ4TTJ0a2ON4N1PTdRapEq8XcfKDfAHPIsyUQCM6lLUAAmNWQvdM4 O6tUddej4WuFcxQDABHr3A==;
X-AuditID: 44571fa7-3fdff70000018e96-76-5eb5d50254b1
Received: from PACDCEX48.cable.comcast.com (cas-umc02.ndceast.pa.bo.comcast.net [68.87.34.28]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id D3.E8.36502.205D5BE5; Fri, 8 May 2020 17:54:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PACDCEX15.cable.comcast.com (24.40.1.138) by PACDCEX48.cable.comcast.com (24.40.2.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 8 May 2020 17:54:09 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXEDGE01.cable.comcast.com (76.96.78.71) by PACDCEX15.cable.comcast.com (24.40.1.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 May 2020 17:54:09 -0400
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.105) by webmail.comcast.com (76.96.78.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 8 May 2020 17:54:09 -0400
Received: from MN2PR11MB4744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:263::17) by MN2PR11MB3616.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ed::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.29; Fri, 8 May 2020 21:54:08 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c58:61ab:be4:a730]) by MN2PR11MB4744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6c58:61ab:be4:a730%8]) with mapi id 15.20.2958.035; Fri, 8 May 2020 21:54:08 +0000
From: "Ozer, Sebnem" <Sebnem_Ozer@comcast.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
Thread-Index: AQHWIkAS80whbaKHZkuWUfjIPUuTd6iewLHA
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 21:54:08 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB47440860A44ABBF087F6F6B59EA20@MN2PR11MB4744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <46720ce0-ffcb-e97f-3e2d-6b5274b73b15@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <46720ce0-ffcb-e97f-3e2d-6b5274b73b15@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: mti-systems.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mti-systems.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=comcast.com;
x-originating-ip: [2601:49:100:43c0:40be:62ab:f0d7:272b]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2bda8994-aaa7-4043-1279-08d7f39a55e0
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3616:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3616ED79E68F44FA43DAC9089EA20@MN2PR11MB3616.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 039735BC4E
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: T1nBUmJ0zwA0WaK9JzX6+eSD1CO2Ckl2iYLFe5moClulidZ0HJ1DwoRqmEhwlBmcapXArErXChPK/djfRmygEIb4qPKse6DlVHZpsZ0BWVAQKy/E94qff1J33BoaijIiUpirQrZvSSFYMh6ZMZgtzSy2YpuTH79DDYy18DhQ2/CyGUmfDyPnJp16BM9GHrjC3wbQqg/51703L8YKjP/p69uZw+MAZlqtgmf0e9hYLNLq9jARLENJqIe4dKXVCwjm5OFWJGNoRwSP3gGMI4Bn0JNXHJbOtvp0ZDAns6/x7Iz7FcjvRNGfosDxobMqUpiYT/2o52OHSVgcVkbuC0ON5wbstpFWYiaYV5yvWlbc0tSzlBX+CtadUQ2orh1NcGrCactDHUhRVQyJMEp8vhETfic/X0kWkkazvCIi/0dz2iRbIzx6YtuMkRI6gD49aSbDRoGoJjfY0diLIeRsuSWuJbH91Bm0lrmKJmmMJ4aG6hCB7eqldvyUotM4XJNN8CaYDq183si59FJRYtS5w4tSyQrHgTjFtuZ+9V+t5wf0wRtbaNe3+4lDJmR0ob+QmmDFptB1MGEhBIlTP0B01s2PYyEbaZdWDZ1OLw9wQK/ERgE=
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB4744.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(33430700001)(55016002)(33656002)(2906002)(5660300002)(66446008)(66556008)(33440700001)(66476007)(76116006)(316002)(8676002)(71200400001)(8936002)(52536014)(6506007)(186003)(53546011)(86362001)(64756008)(478600001)(9686003)(110136005)(66574014)(66946007)(166002)(7696005)(9326002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Xu1qV6vBxt9pIrohU2ZdFIviyasu5kBlp2dvcrLq6N9aBMeouTbaKiLxmYzeL9VRhzl7qbkECaInXwV+P5kUt/GAoa+Vf/j0zktq36J7Vy7yCN6CFM9T6+TByrBIUmzsNru8YkHQrg1OkKMVng4QMr6tOSMJf7wwrKx5IDspE7q3NaiyKYJOXD/QEzFQLvXDrgR+XQVybuh8GwJSebYu/2TJFCile8X5okn5wS3R/HCAc6xCG3kLGM8QXdl3wuPCtkDF80402/35/PuRnEx1RdQ9RpmCAX0TYlosEGr7og6PAFItbx6p+M5ovKiX4NxBOlUrWt4PqMT1H2ra5skzxw==
arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=i5jpEAvtagU6bn/3ufO8JPaBXsrGCDmRABED4brTuaI=; b=QfAScAl3bkVGStrpAU4XCUmKfagmFRSQDaJCNRWPxbDRCa0gEcHAnXllqnf1/fORhnqlCNWsemgvmsrVLzWx4cTV7S08+Ugm1quMb06O9P3Lprs3/iJKJOY3HRAWr0lVTqgs/dJ9qVInybDpQZCeU8PD0SQ3pJt+LEIRrMvFwTdoNqIjatFU9fF3apvO26bSBIhWgCR8dlUE9xksGKT49xGQNCjjbPo6fP+PKd325S+YWL/ZpHzXVTt1zH49chM9q1EkMhDrf1F5tPr0pC70hcGPikT+cteGTruZ1h2ja5uU1Pisg2W3+zxvxsVOiPpx9XH15AEkIWECOE5Gh1TQDQ==
arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=comcast.com; dkim=pass header.d=comcast.com; arc=none
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastcorp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-comcastcorp-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=i5jpEAvtagU6bn/3ufO8JPaBXsrGCDmRABED4brTuaI=; b=WOUPOv4oILcS7OXnbOz0pP0SinqftW1S5wjtdlCSoL64qAhTvRwUbErTrnUCoxCcO8T7n1amqB6ng7ykK6BWoM6Y6YzmLwrSe7lQrRipfbD2CrNmkLmItNkyiG/gpijj0dVPsJNpOQHJa7cM71Y98/M4qS/onR7hIiRdkb8a7mk=
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-network-message-id: 2bda8994-aaa7-4043-1279-08d7f39a55e0
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2020 21:54:08.6201 (UTC)
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-id: 906aefe9-76a7-4f65-b82d-5ec20775d5aa
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
x-ms-exchange-crosstenant-userprincipalname: 0SH2cp5YHDYyjSNXvHP1b5OTclizimKX9I1Km7uxT8AkGgq3LhmRz2zzRxIdD0SDGkSHRmkxTNxg7ciakg5dSE3PF0cJDxCrZ5VyRHGuNNQ=
x-ms-exchange-transport-crosstenantheadersstamped: MN2PR11MB3616
x-originatororg: comcast.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB47440860A44ABBF087F6F6B59EA20MN2PR11MB4744namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprHKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXiEq4ko8t0dWucwc0TIhbH3txls7j+nd2B yWPJkp9MHidP9bIFMEVx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZTx9q1ewpbBi59PtbA2Ma/K6GDk5JARMJA7u amXtYuTiEBI4wiTRvKCBBcLZySgxZ8VRNgjnCqPEjPaPTBDOUUaJ5Vf2MUM4i5kkjmxrhhpw n1Gi+UcHI8hkNgE9icm3HrCD2CICHhILj95mA7GFBXQlVty6zAQR15NY+W4zK4RtJPF74ydm EJtFQEVi1sP3YDW8AjESWxZtZgGxhQScJFa8fg0W5xRwllh48iPYfEYBMYnvp9aAxZkFxCVu PZnPBPGdgMSSPeeZIWxRiZeP/4Edyigwi1Fi342FbBAJC4meU1egbFmJS/O7GSFsX4k7W2ZA 2VoSZxrbgWo4gOxsia0vXCDC6hItH+exQtgyEn/mXIDaKyexqvchC0z8wY3t4HCUEOhnldjb tgUq0coi0bq7dAKj4Swkd0PY+RJvXr1nnwX2v6DEyZlPWGYBrWYW0JRYv0sfokRRYkr3Q3YI W0Oidc5cdmTxBYzsqxh5zCz0LMz1jA31DM3MNzGCU4388h2M22dlHGIU4GBU4uH1PbM1Tog1 say4MvcQowQHs5II78SKLXFCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGKU5WJTEeRcbB8QJCaQnlqRmp6YW pBbBZJk4OKUaGLvMTdydY365PE5PF7+w/+OPnXftkxrufS0qjuyeZSe27fKtfNGAUnG/sHOh Ahrmdw4+N9onvF80dN2p3Wzn3+UFXknq7uyLuLZ++Xntv+4LkyeZtxW0dVjkyKZ8nZ+xI1iq 7kUGdynfxPlO0cWBE6yOdW21iztinbZn7+NTrqsrNRQPfp6jrMRSnJFoqMVcVJwIAHbXG50x AwAA
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-08_19:2020-05-08, 2020-05-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/__KpySXqm04lEXYx8ZZ4l3HMPgA>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 21:54:32 -0000
Hi All, I support option 1. I support using ECT(1) as an input signal to the network. This is the approach consistent with the current L4S drafts. This position does not mean that there are no remaining issues with L4S, but that the remaining issues can be resolved by continued WG effort on the current drafts. Thanks, Sebnem Ozer Comcast From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Wesley Eddy Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 2:15 PM To: tsvwg@ietf.org Subject: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) In this email thread, please state, concisely, which of the following viewpoints on ECT(1) you prefer. Please have extended discussion in a different thread. If you are uncomfortable sharing your opinion on the list, you may email the tsvwg chairs directly (tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>). If you did not attend the 27 April interim, please watch the meeting video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw3YKyeFxQU<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw3YKyeFxQU__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!QRzgyPE5ColHdJ1V081XThUXRsVbXCEVtxJXq1if8tY_Ly93j53UKPB0UnaOfubI67E$>] for context on this question. 1. I support using ECT(1) as an input signal to the network. This is the approach consistent with the current L4S drafts. This position does not mean that there are no remaining issues with L4S, but that the remaining issues can be resolved by continued WG effort on the current drafts. 2. I support using ECT(1) as an output signal from the network. This is consistent with SCE. If you believe L4S will not be safe for the internet without significant architectural changes, you are in this group. 3. There is a specific test or tests I need to see before making a decision about ECT(1). Please be specific about the tests in your response. Please submit your opinion by 5/18/2020.
- [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Greg White
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Steven Blake
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Jeremy Harris
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Smith, Kevin, Vodafone Group
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Roland Bless
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Anders Bloom
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Finkelstein, Jeff (CCI-Atlanta)
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Tommy Pauly
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) C. M. Heard
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Uma Chunduri
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Ruediger.Geib
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Kyle Rose
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Black, David
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Ozer, Sebnem
- [tsvwg] 3) "There is a specific test or tests I n… Dave Taht
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Ranganathan, Ram
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Paul Vixie
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Adi Masputra
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Asad Sajjad Ahmed
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Christoph Paasch
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Scheffenegger, Richard
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Lars Eggert
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Andreas Petlund
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Jana Iyengar
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Joakim Misund
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Pete Heist
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Vividh Siddha
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) David Pullen
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Campos, Angel, Vodafone Spain
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Karthik Sundaresan
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) philip.eardley
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Tom Henderson
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Dave Taht
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) K. K. Ramakrishnan
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Liyizhou
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Dan Siemon
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Mohit P. Tahiliani
- [tsvwg] More testing (was: Consensus call on ECT(… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Roland Bless
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [tsvwg] Consensus call on ECT(1) Steven Blake