Re: [tsvwg] path forward on L4S issue #16

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073893A0938 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 03:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBuc0DRT-vUm for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 03:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F853A0CFE for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 03:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id h188so12104273lfd.7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=x6owyzPxON3CHF474af6nQlbJt/5yUpXct/38iWfuCc=; b=Z085RZdibhvg62pnNFO1MDJfX/Dk+vjR/FOkJZDQCKYPecaE+aCXGmZgmHXqL4l6fI 2+L4/Ht1g0biNHXkq40BRXsx6OQeZ3bQ5ZLHUBeB4xTlJnBH7KkGWgTo5cxdA0gvkRyo 0j6wI9q3P+DSo4hV2cdK4IispyWszFoef9N/6/UrF/s0NjnOnbqO3uJVT9eAwUZCWbLC MsIXb3PiygZ8UF9yjSwqQ9rFeTEUQAjj1+wVY6CLzANCaHWQE1zXzZ3BrLWuLh3fLFc4 Esv7d+3pvQou7M3muql1AuTbjM3odcYsmFiCqWh3sWfFOAKySrxiylPJ9tbjFGCnioel qDmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=x6owyzPxON3CHF474af6nQlbJt/5yUpXct/38iWfuCc=; b=rI5EqicXJ+BOAgyC7XzD1l9Gb0f5gQtc8zOwQE2NV/NWM7rMrpesjHIr/fI/6Iy4Fc qN3HhyxXWCgs7Fh2DYI08wD7lvJ3lWF9uuRi05ysLu/YLb7tJdN7zjz2+Z4Ewlrx9Ip2 3ar3p+0Ks5Eti4FY8ZRtr18wTf06bhkJMYfecJi//BuiVPRKv7kZcDhdBaCmGJn0ucSQ ACooedvGDuqUjoibzgjl1SPNbK+4tvr71PO8+wVVD7YFRqIUQoAkpRz2g1t4VThA3smB Jl/V/GxdQtOHMedtF7ZiX0bglppSYPDjS7BjaE8t1XYArA35hnnlEyWWmAcpzb0yFg9b T88Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531+2NKWnTJMRh9+axsAbxTBsfRm5t7Siy3Aq60JCTjyHBWlMgbh uwoEuQtjoX364l3ajcGnydAvKXcq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxl4c398ZdQq8VLnZBtY7cROmTLtmo9ANqSdEJPjDN1Rpdm/rBUwXYkAM4wU08LH2Q0L6Rp8g==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:ec07:: with SMTP id b7mr15003722lfa.9.1591697378247; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-237-14-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.237.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 11sm4228581lju.118.2020.06.09.03.09.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 03:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB2876AA3CBBA215B9FB895B0AC2820@HE1PR0701MB2876.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 13:09:36 +0300
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3637517F-63A0-4862-9885-AB5EA7E6C273@gmail.com>
References: <HE1PR0701MB2876AA3CBBA215B9FB895B0AC2820@HE1PR0701MB2876.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/hqPJQaW3tjqZt1sJELy2hfUsfCk>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] path forward on L4S issue #16
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 10:09:43 -0000

> On 9 Jun, 2020, at 10:33 am, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> "Even though it is more than a magnitude difference in queue delay between
> CoDel-ECN and L4S, it is fair to say that these simple simulations should of
> course be seen as just a snapshot."

Not to mention a magnitude difference in throughput.

 - Jonathan Morton