IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] plan for L4S issue #29

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Mon, 28 September 2020 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8933A1383 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nvqj0cF0Mmu for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D203A1338 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id c2so1961156ljj.12 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3iuSDkH50l1P1ziKG/jbtMWcuYNoK9PIoWezuRM0i/4=; b=rz25A+KFKRMhyl5bQnIrlu3JGKm8MG1jLPYXcNdOZMV5+yhMQDE8+27ukq3kd9qizX WJbDIQnpgnC+ImEOfBVO71YSL9YjShH8JbnOjuMRhQcsoe7FrRVJPnIDbV+JNR3iLs2v t+HddxNkjanys+IKO7HKZ4rRGDuAWeee2pyJDEJgf482PdH4zLS+RAs3ycoZIQS70B3I y3tPfwfrhq6aG8EqB7BLDbk0ej++vgJwoyWoj3GbakPHO2/2CYMuU3gusVfCwKsCccDk rFgUrWaRPPXy0EURAwGrow2KYXpHN7KO1hNVReAap0Ie4esWB347tsr6F0nh8jf2kGKZ Cxuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3iuSDkH50l1P1ziKG/jbtMWcuYNoK9PIoWezuRM0i/4=; b=EIS7I5mOnQPNgv8muw6pyweEOjur0kolSK61Csejx5XwR+Dw/3EnBd/dFRTduWCeSb 65p4HHxBT4zAS2VifozYOLU2kFTQ12hWyfJPU3gZm9bmyVMzkBTdn44t2MMGI9d5JTfX wyjtzGuwpuw5rc+zcZD9I3sONl2A3qVerZCFlUHPeV5qaCrMKnrWB7t0/afd0W0aZgcL lQc5ayLT6gsyfqOc9LS2d0PMbjGJG7NKN3M6vyBTGXAQEY3mTF5kEy9N/AJKJnsJa/Tk /r0MkJVbIjxCKyMDWuRhbubSaY7hl7UTOiwKjmehb4NIPKBeFhHwBtF7N44cWW6ZSFm2 4XHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FZOC8XSu10SjCjOZNzVV3b1eDv4j8spHClu1GubQ1mnJQBhr0 /ghBBvQx/9CAiIco4cxyglcYRTP20og=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyJTPc8ygBsfk+zra/O2hW+Ks9uy7PzEfd2DBhRPunjTmUNPcJiEYQgpcBjP/KWZcy+bi/sg==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b174:: with SMTP id a20mr27485ljm.407.1601321409595; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-170-35.bb.dnainternet.fi. [178.55.170.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l188sm2936644lfd.127.2020.09.28.12.30.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.6\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009282110300.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 22:30:07 +0300
Cc: "Gorry (erg)" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED8B8768-0555-4403-A43C-205D7725BF79@gmail.com>
References: <5A76D272-0E62-478B-B09B-D6F17670E9F9@gmail.com> <16196033-DC44-439B-82E1-7A3B3016692B@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009282110300.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike=40swm.pp.se@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/rXlozL0bbeShs43BFceXo-iWh_c>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] plan for L4S issue #29
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:30:13 -0000

> On 28 Sep, 2020, at 10:21 pm, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike=40swm.pp.se@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I think both L4S and SCE has problems and I think proponents for both are glossing over some of these problems.

The SCE team has merely stepped back a bit, watching to see if L4S actually manages to make any technical progress.  Meanwhile we are continuing work in our own direction.  We know SCE is imperfect, but we still think it is a better foundation for development.

> What happened to the L4S issue # 16 discussion? It seems to have died in June with no conclusion?

The L4S team tried to close it without actually resolving it, same as #29 right now.  Both issues need to remain open until a resolution is actually achieved.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email