IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

"Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org> Wed, 05 July 2006 11:51 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fy5uf-00061I-Nh; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:51:25 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fy5ue-00061C-JD for uri-review@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:51:24 -0400
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fy5ua-00056q-9u for uri-review@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:51:24 -0400
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n15so1149806nfc for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QUfKldzDFR48iom+lrDZuqH4qRaXAXfK5MI2TjoQF22SXGMGevn85D9ko1YHV1Nh6BHYcy7FS6XCgIEwKg9cPfU+qtTf1jDxKl4nux3xRIf+nM8LLUT25XWSfWkFjo8K3hxBC4yOTq2FF0yRi+XlVYL2HbKAhkWr1HFswHWdkXw=
Received: by 10.78.177.3 with SMTP id z3mr3426618hue; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 04:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.15.17 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 04:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0607050451m70bfeeebr6e137090108a04a6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 07:51:19 -0400
From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
To: Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
In-Reply-To: <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E10315001972C6231@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c70bc85d0607041938y21c153dbt39fcda5144940086@mail.gmail.com> <1D4A05136773CF4DB373F6FE4E10315001972C6231@df-pug-msg.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: e04a06299b740fec
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Cc: "John Calhoon (LCA)" <John.Calhoon@microsoft.com>, TedHardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Jerry Dunietz <jerryd@windows.microsoft.com>, Gregg Brown <greggb@microsoft.com>
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

On 7/5/06, Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> I should have been more specific in my previous question. I was asking for explanations on how Uri rewriting may work for the particular case we are discussing - a package residing in a database on a server. I still don't get it.
>
> Could you please provide more specific example?

Well, the same mechanism I described could be used to a expose the URI
you asked about;

http://www.example.org/foo/packages.asp?name=my.package

As, say, this;

http://www.example.org/foo/packages/my.package

The intent would be that the latter URI would be published to the
world instead of the former.

Mark.

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email