RE: [Uri-review] Request for review

Mark,

On 7/4/06, Mark Baker <> wrote:
>Andrey,

>On 7/4/06, Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Ok. I see your point.
>> To complete the picture - how your solution works for the packages >>residing in a database on a server? For instance a package at: >>http://www.example.org/foo/packages.asp?name=my.package

>I'd suggest you publish a purely hierarchical URI like the ones I've
>suggested, and then use URI rewriting to map it to URIs like that one
>above (if that's what your database requires).  Obviously my solution
>does rely on hierarchy.
>Cheers,
>Mark.

I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. Could you please provide an example on <URI rewriting>, you've mentioned?

Regards,
- Andrey

-----Original Message-----
From: mbaker@gmail.com [mailto:mbaker@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mark Baker
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 4:39 AM
To: Andrey Shur
Cc: Jerry Dunietz; Martin Duerst; John Calhoon (LCA); TedHardie; uri-review@ietf.org; Gregg Brown
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review

Andrey,

On 7/4/06, Andrey Shur <andreysh@exchange.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Ok. I see your point.
> To complete the picture - how your solution works for the packages residing in a database on a server? For instance a package at: http://www.example.org/foo/packages.asp?name=my.package

I'd suggest you publish a purely hierarchical URI like the ones I've
suggested, and then use URI rewriting to map it to URIs like that one
above (if that's what your database requires).  Obviously my solution
does rely on hierarchy.

Cheers,

Mark.

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review