Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sat, 20 August 2011 08:39 UTC
Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53D021F8B3A for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.158, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gmw+jN8M1m6T for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C7E21F8B39 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so2603319fxe.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MyCP//GvYp7jKrnsyN2ygCqJrkvqY7tE074E3lnCP4s=; b=poDxvphQ8IhZeWSED75nUIJoPVxlUQEc7NSUy/X18wtKYQx80Gu4xSavmdjtPu+u4N 7D/iXNvQ8TfeW0OfytFjnHrSESombNoIwGOQj4btfjM1JKfpHaxWPwarRjoUEhHyfiHH d9/Rr6Selto/MtNTTelWLH/TRP2akBmjCy5kc=
Received: by 10.223.55.203 with SMTP id v11mr526578fag.78.1313829655396; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm3211494fav.34.2011.08.20.01.40.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 01:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E4F733A.2070204@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:41:30 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
References: <CAHhFybrZJC8res4BKkAcPtiCByFzygCyW4KSzkHu9Kzs+h+isA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHhFybrZJC8res4BKkAcPtiCByFzygCyW4KSzkHu9Kzs+h+isA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, uri@w3.org, draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:39:57 -0000
Frank, all, 20.08.2011 10:25, Frank Ellermann wrote: > [ . . . ] > > Author/Change controller: > IESG (the transition from a "provisional" to "historical" status is > not covered by BCP 35 section 5.3; maybe the pack: scheme could be > simply identified as "non-URI" and removed from the scheme registry). I suppose this is the best possible way, even despites RFC 4395 has no mention of how this can be done. As you've mentioned before, 'pack' URIs aren't 3986-compatible; this means that they aren't URIs in context of the current in-force-standard. Anyway, Andrey Shur was declared to be "Change controller", and he will have to accept such action. I'm cc'ing this message to draft-shur-pack-uri-scheme@tools.ietf.org; so let's wait the authors to act. Mykyta > References: > STD 66 (RFC 3986), I-D.shur-pack-uri-scheme-05 (same as -03 and -04). > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >
- [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Daniel R. Tobias
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Gregg Brown
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Jerry Dunietz
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Jerry Dunietz
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Jerry Dunietz
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mark Baker
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Roy T. Fielding
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Roy T. Fielding
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Roy T. Fielding
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Martin Duerst
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- RE: [Uri-review] Request for review Andrey Shur
- [Uri-review] Request for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: [Uri-review] Request for review Frank Ellermann