Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 15:36 UTC
Return-Path: <bob@eventbrite.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0909521F8E58 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, URI_HEX=0.368]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z8UQpK33c2O4 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D38821F8CA7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iabn5 with SMTP id n5so9241622iab.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.44.199 with SMTP id uh7mr40776456icb.25.1319470583599; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.180.195 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EA52F0F.20007@gmail.com>
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com> <4EA33D70.6080500@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EA4EDFB.3050406@gmail.com> <CAHcUcOF=z7v5cTN7gsvfX45QLw2jGNSdiQYgybUB6Aq=BjjkZw@mail.gmail.com> <4EA52F0F.20007@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:36:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHcUcOGR5F5oA98=q43JgH7JN3GEB0pyEA1XwTp2TqUnOO1eMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:36:31 -0000
In development, yes. On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> wrote: > 24.10.2011 8:32, Bob Van Zant wrote: >> >> In that discussion the working group appears to be agreeing that >> there's no reason to ask organizations to register structured names >> like com-eventbrite-attendee. It does not appear to suggest that >> organizations should not register their schemes. > > Have you been using this name so far? Mykyta > >> >> In any case I submitted our registration request to IANA before this >> occurred. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev<evnikita2@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> 23.10.2011 1:02, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Mykyta, >>>> >>>> On 2011/10/22 13:48, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Bob, >>>>> >>>>> The IRI WG has reached the consensus to remove the statement you were >>>>> guided by in the 4395bis. >>>> >>>> Can you say which statement you are referring to? >>> >>> See http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/73; that's >>> >>>> Organizations that desire a private name space for URI scheme names >>>> are encouraged to use a prefix based on their domain name, expressed >>>> in reverse order. For example, a URI scheme name of com-example-info >>>> might be registered by the vendor that owns the example.com domain >>>> name. >>> >>> Mykyta >>> >>>> Regards, Martin. >>>> >>>>> It hasn't been the current practice, I and I >>>>> don't recommend you to proceed with the registration. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev >>>>> >>>>> 11.10.2011 2:30, Bob Van Zant wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It looks like most URI schemes like this one are never registered with >>>>>> IANA. It seems like The Right Thing to do and so I present to the list >>>>>> the URI scheme com-eventbrite-attendee. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> URI scheme name. >>>>>> com-eventbrite-attendee >>>>>> >>>>>> Status. >>>>>> provisional >>>>>> >>>>>> URI scheme syntax. >>>>>> uri = "com-eventbrite-attendee:" method [ "?" query ] >>>>>> method = "resetpassword" / "tickets" >>>>>> >>>>>> Example: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> com-eventbrite-attendee:resetpassword?email=user%40domain.com&token=DEADBEEF >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> URI scheme semantics. >>>>>> This scheme is intended to be used by operating systems that have the >>>>>> Eventbrite Attendee application installed. When a URI with >>>>>> this scheme is encountered it is expected that the operating system >>>>>> launches the Eventbrite Attendee application with the method and >>>>>> query parameters specified in the URI. >>>>>> >>>>>> The exact semantics for how URL information is communicated to the >>>>>> Eventbrite Attendee app may vary on an operating system basis. The >>>>>> expectation is simply that the operating system follows its own >>>>>> conventions for passing the method and query parameters into the >>>>>> application. >>>>>> >>>>>> Encoding considerations. >>>>>> The scheme and method portions of this proposed URI avoid encoding >>>>>> issues by limiting itself to a subset of ASCII. >>>>>> >>>>>> The query portion of a com-eventbrite-attendee URI shall be encoded >>>>>> according to the rules in RFC 3986. >>>>>> >>>>>> Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Eventbrite Attendee for iOS >>>>>> - Eventbrite Attendee for Android >>>>>> >>>>>> Interoperability considerations. >>>>>> none. >>>>>> >>>>>> Security considerations. >>>>>> Against recommendations in RFC 3986 section 7.5 a >>>>>> com-eventbrite-attendee: URI may be used to transmit sensitive >>>>>> information. For example, it may be used to communicate a password >>>>>> reset token in email for a user following a "Forgot your password" >>>>>> flow. Though this token may have transmitted over insecure channels >>>>>> on its way to the application care must still be taken by >>>>>> application developers to not divulge this secret. >>>>>> >>>>>> RFC 3986 sections 7.2 and 7.5 apply >>>>>> >>>>>> Contact. >>>>>> Bob Van Zant >>>>>> Eventbrite >>>>>> 651 Brannan St >>>>>> San Francisco, CA 94103 >>>>>> USA >>>>>> >>>>>> EMail: bob@eventbrite.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Author/Change controller. >>>>>> Bob Van Zant >>>>>> >>>>>> References. >>>>>> >>>>>> Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform >>>>>> Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, RFC 3986, >>>>>> January 2005. >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Uri-review mailing list >>>>>> Uri-review@ietf.org >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Uri-review mailing list >>>>> Uri-review@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Uri-review mailing list >>> Uri-review@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >>> > >
- [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mark Baker
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst