Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review

It appears that the feedback on this proposal has quieted and I don't
have any pending changes to make. What is the next step?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:09 PM, "Martin J. Dürst"
<duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
> On 2011/10/13 5:42, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>>
>> On 11 October 2011 21:35, Bob Van Zant wrote:
>>
>>> I could see some utility of this being registered so that application
>>> developers of, for example, mail gateway software and in particular
>>> anti-{spam,malware} software, would be aware of our scheme and not
>>> immediately assume something malicious or nefarious.
>>
>> Okay.  And if that results in dozens of appname-exec:something?query
>> schemes somebody can suggest a general exec:appname/something?query
>> scheme (or similar.)
>
> Yes indeed. exec: would be quite general. Something more specific such as
> iphone-app-startup: would also work; it shouldn't be too difficult to create
> an application that starts up with that URI and then looks at the rest and
> starts up another application. Of course, that doesn't solve the problem
> that these links don't work outside iphone and friends, but it would remove
> the problem of thousands of non-registered schemes, or push the registration
> problem a level lower.
>
> Regards,    Martin.
>
>> So far the URI scheme registry does not suffer
>> from too many registrations.
>>
>> Thanks for your<URL:com-eventbrite-attendee:tickets>  explanation,
>>  Frank
>> _______________________________________________
>> Uri-review mailing list
>> Uri-review@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>>
>