Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 04:44 UTC
Return-Path: <bob@eventbrite.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6A221F8CD3 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.587, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5YGIcEGAGQ7 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA4C1F0C47 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so10331695iae.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.29.6 with SMTP id p6mr10088735icc.44.1321332288814; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.177.65 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4EA6569F.9070600@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <CAHcUcOGgv8deMk3yw0FH8HrHee5Hi0pXcFCRwYDfaO_ta_nuGA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA24B23.3010900@gmail.com> <4EA33D70.6080500@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4EA4EDFB.3050406@gmail.com> <CAHcUcOF=z7v5cTN7gsvfX45QLw2jGNSdiQYgybUB6Aq=BjjkZw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHhFybpk=2uXXia-LDEGz=S_xtE7bawEhHHsB8FZ8eVWbHksUA@mail.gmail.com> <4EA6569F.9070600@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:44:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHcUcOEBfYZfPwo2qa3RepM_dmu1ehS9E4d3uxpQL1JLwHK+tQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bob Van Zant <bob@eventbrite.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf301d4266b4800704b1bea501"
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:44:50 -0000
I figured I'd follow up for the purposes of the archives and let everyone know that IANA did approve our request for the provisional uri scheme com-eventbrite-attendee. After the feedback in this thread IANA asked no follow up questions and simply approved the request. The process truly was painless. Thanks for the feedback and discussion. http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/com-eventbrite-attendee -Bob On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:26 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote: > I made this a ticket at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/** > iri/trac/ticket/100 <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/ticket/100>. > Please continue discussion of general registration issues on the IETF WG > IRI list, public-iri@w3.org. > > Regards, Martin. > > > On 2011/10/25 14:21, Frank Ellermann wrote: > >> On 24 October 2011 07:32, Bob Van Zant wrote: >> >> In any case I submitted our registration request to >>> IANA before this occurred. >>> >> >> Maybe 4395bis should pick two instead of four weeks >> for reviews. It works on another list with the same >> expert. IANA or expert can always bounce a request >> if they feel that it needs more tuning, but generally >> your intuitive approach (silence => submit) should be >> good enough. >> >> -Frank >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Uri-review mailing list >> Uri-review@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/uri-review<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review> >> >>
- [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mark Baker
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Bob Van Zant
- Re: [Uri-review] New URI scheme for review Martin J. Dürst