IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] Of RFC3187bis, RFC3188bis and namespace registrations in general

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 21 December 2011 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C941F0C4C for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:53:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uO5NSF-nXYQ7 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD7D1F0C3B for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C409A4248C; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:01:06 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EF20EF3.8060605@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:53:07 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
References: <4E96C9EA.8070605@helsinki.fi> <4EEBBE82.3090004@stpeter.im> <4EF1CAE2.7000900@helsinki.fi> <B671A4FF-EAD0-4C2B-AE8C-A5C449C0F8ED@hxr.us>
In-Reply-To: <B671A4FF-EAD0-4C2B-AE8C-A5C449C0F8ED@hxr.us>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] Of RFC3187bis, RFC3188bis and namespace registrations in general
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:53:11 -0000

<hat type='AD'/>

On 12/21/11 7:28 AM, Andy Newton wrote:
> Juha (and the WG),
> 
> One of the problems I see with these discussions is that these
> threads intertwine noted issues with the documents and larger
> architectural or philosophical issues. That can get confusing.
> 
> I would like to ask you, as a document editor, and the working group
> if we should use the issue tracker for dealing with document issues
> so that they do not get lost in the larger debates. Comments?
> 
> As for the larger issues, we can discuss them and after there is
> consensus on how to move forward with addressing those issues will be
> able to knock them out through documents.
> 
> What say you?
> 
> -andy

Andy, I think that would indeed be helpful. Although the more
"philosophical" issues are interesting and important, we also need to
focus the discussion down to specific text proposals to be incorporated
into the specificuations under consideration. Using the issue tracker
might help move us in that direction.

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email