Re: [urn] Of RFC3187bis, RFC3188bis and namespace registrations in general

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 20 December 2011 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B3E21F8AB9 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:55:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zl3IqdTvoi5U for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5961321F8A7D for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-192.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.192]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B6A24234D; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:03:33 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EF0CC0F.6010207@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 10:55:27 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <4E96C9EA.8070605@helsinki.fi> <4EEBBE82.3090004@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20111217013713.09040ae0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20111217013713.09040ae0@resistor.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] Of RFC3187bis, RFC3188bis and namespace registrations in general
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:55:39 -0000

<hat type='AD'/>

On 12/17/11 3:07 AM, SM wrote:
> At 13:56 16-12-2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I'd welcome that discussion.
> 
> Seven messages were posted to this mailing list since November 1.  Two
> of the messages were about a workshop.  Three of them were from Peter
> Saint-Andre as an individual.

SM, although I too am concerned about the lack of involvement, the
choice of November 1 as the cutoff date for your measurements is a bit
misleading, because there was a flurry of activity (at least from Juha
and Alfred) in October. However, the lack of activity since then is not
encouraging.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/