IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] Of RFC3187bis, RFC3188bis and namespace registrations in general

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 21 December 2011 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181B421F8B06 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:08:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hB0kZeelh6jH for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:08:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D611521F8B03 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBLI8gS6005122; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:08:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1324490929; bh=IPyyEmVMQYVUqVtNAlOzlgLYqH2iMBqeKLmNfxcWzdc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=uoxifJXHzElmB7s7FbcJpYfmCz1BJEtmYYvxZUQqKJh0x3zmdAtgV0LjByW1mpvim qkOP8hVetzo4/4Q2+CE7rBwqdnkaGcoDL4oXXt05ZBIssBdSI5v7O2sSQTdEUVREd4 pCnj7mFWpe0FN0n3ULhFWs7f+LWmoffgLQ1/ZSFU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1324490929; bh=IPyyEmVMQYVUqVtNAlOzlgLYqH2iMBqeKLmNfxcWzdc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=i/A5avlQl3PuMoOEgPlGq+J+N3Dl+FZWtaYD+XmDY49wkVdS1FJHhUt1GH+1zTLYW ZWF1yEqolinMBHZ9FAF/P2nYsTXE3p7KAGzAD/IsRGdbNKMOysUif26XYOK0wU3Tj8 YXrNCO1odTFXGSBKm+3s03EY48tS5mqgf6qc4Gk0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111221095836.062bdfe0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:08:37 -0800
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4EF0CC0F.6010207@stpeter.im>
References: <4E96C9EA.8070605@helsinki.fi> <4EEBBE82.3090004@stpeter.im> <6.2.5.6.2.20111217013713.09040ae0@resistor.net> <4EF0CC0F.6010207@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] Of RFC3187bis, RFC3188bis and namespace registrations in general
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:08:53 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 09:55 20-12-2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>SM, although I too am concerned about the lack of involvement, the
>choice of November 1 as the cutoff date for your measurements is a bit
>misleading, because there was a flurry of activity (at least from Juha

I agree that the choice of the cutoff date for the measurement is 
misleading.  It helps to have somebody else (e.g. as you did in this 
case) discuss about the comments and drafts to catch mistakes.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email